poewelch84
Well-Known Member
I could see him getting moved inside on passing downs to change things up much like Seattle does with Bennett. I'm not as down on the pick as some simply because he's from Stanford.
In a 4-3, outside pressure comes from the DEs.
The 49ers will not be running a pure 4-3. They are modeling their defense after Seattle although the new DC says there will be some differences. They might run a base 4-3 but sometimes it will be hybrid 3-4. I don't know care to know the details, but I think this group, unlike Baalke, have an idea on how to draft people to fit the scheme they will be installing. Is not a lock that Lynch will be the LEO. The coaching staff is considering Armstead at that position also.
This is the time to start experimenting, seeing which combinations might work? Realistically, Armstead won't fill the Leo consistently, but MAYBE against certain opponents, in certain situations? Same as if they move Thomas to Leo, MAYBE against certain opponents, in certain situations?
IF Carradine sticks thru this off-season, he should get a look at Leo too.
We don't have a Leo really, so maybe its by Committee?
I think they will be experimenting and giving people a chance. I don't have much faith in Tank. Just didn't see anything from him last year. Armstead looked pretty good as a pass rusher his rookie year before the injury. I think his issue is defending the run so a pass rushing role might better suit him. Lynch is the most talented of the group but the question is can he come into to camp healthy, in good shape, and motivated. Eli Harold's PFF pass rushing efficiency score was worse than Tanks.
Fair enough.Then let me change "inside" to mean "defensive linemen". This is why Thomas could prove huge, he could provide the pressure we need, no matter how you want to describe it.
For obvious passing downs, he can be moved anywhere along the line. Wouldn't move him around too much (on obvious passing downs), but sometimes we need to mix it up, depending on the opponents weakness.
Fair enough.
230 is an excellent weight for a linebacker; especially one who depends on speed like Foster. My concern, if you read my posts, with Thomas' weight is playing him on the inside of the line as I thought you were suggesting. He can play DE at 280.BTW - You're 'swayed' by Thomas' weight, saying he's too light. But you're not bothered by Foster at 229 lbs, any particular reason(s) why?
If Thomas was 283, would you then be ok? If not, how heavy?
230 is an excellent weight for a linebacker; especially one who depends on speed like Foster. My concern, if you read my posts, with Thomas' weight is playing him on the inside of the line as I thought you were suggesting. He can play DE at 280.
I'll just be surprised if he is the first Stanford defender to make a big splash in the NFL. They usually bust and I think it is the type of player that Stanford recruits to play their style of defense that is the problem. That is my layman's opinion, but quick guys who play gap defense like at Stanford get rolled over by power like you see in NFL offensive lines.
Its about what Bowman weighed before he became a grown man. Foster will be fine. I'm a little concerned though because I heard one of the draft gurus on ESPN describe Fosters condition as having had "shoulder surgery that didn't take". Not sure that sounds good.oh ok
i think 229 is a little lighter than prototypical, but not complaining. Was just using Foster as an example for being light.
Its about what Bowman weighed before he became a grown man. Foster will be fine. I'm a little concerned though because I heard one of the draft gurus on ESPN describe Fosters condition as having had "shoulder surgery that didn't take". Not sure that sounds good.
If he misses the first six weeks of the season its a wasted season in my opinion. He'll be so rusty and behind everyone else as far as learning the defense and actually playing at live speed that he'd probably end up getting injured.Really not too concerned with that. I read that it happened to another NFL player that required additional surgery. That player missed the first six weeks of the season. For the 49ers, even worse case scenario he needs another surgery, missing half of his first season is no big deal to us as long as he ends up a good player in the long term
If he misses the first six weeks of the season its a wasted season in my opinion. He'll be so rusty and behind everyone else as far as learning the defense and actually playing at live speed that he'd probably end up getting injured.
Yes, it could end up being a wasted first season, but if this guy is as good as people said he can be, then I will take losing one season for the chance to draft him at 31.
Agreed. He is the one guy in the whole draft that I wanted and we got him.Yes, it could end up being a wasted first season, but if this guy is as good as people said he can be, then I will take losing one season for the chance to draft him at 31.
Agreed. He is the one guy in the whole draft that I wanted and we got him.
I would be more concerned if it was a knee