Pattersonca65
Well-Known Member
My bad. That was Allen I was thinking about having the medical issuesThomas has worked his way up in many peoples minds....the way it's going, he's gonna be the automatic pick (after Garrett).
My bad. That was Allen I was thinking about having the medical issuesThomas has worked his way up in many peoples minds....the way it's going, he's gonna be the automatic pick (after Garrett).
In defense of the Mckenzie pick he's a small guy that has elite kick returning ability which could be why they would bring him in as a 7th rounder.1 (2). Solomon Thomas, DE, Stanford
2 (34). Jarrad Davis, LB, Florida
3. (66). Cooper Kupp, WR, Eastern Washington
4 (109). Brad Kaaya, QB, Miami (FL)
4 (143). John Johnson, DB, Boston College
5 (146). Donnel Pumphrey, RB, San Diego State
5 (161). Tanzel Smart, DL, Tulane
6 (186). Jehu Chesson, WR, Michigan
6 (202). Brian Allen, CB, Utah
7 (219). Isaiah McKenzie, WR, Georgia
While i'm certainly for BPA excpet we fans can only go by Need. Looking at this mock i'm totally fine with the first 4 picks. the only small comment i have is in lieu of Kupp, is there an EDGE guy still worth this spot?
If the 5th pick (Johnson) was a CB as opposed to DB, i could buy it. But otherwise using this pick on a DB doesn't make sense? Isn't Ward a "DB" and as is, we don't know where he's going?
Ok with Pumphrey granted don't know how well he catches out of the backfield? But otherwise he is a GOOD runner despite his size.
Of the last 4 picks, i would think we signed enough FA WR's plus added Kupp? So instead of two more WR's, i'd draft another QB and an OT prospect. If not OT, an OG/C prospect.
I don't see a corner makes sense unless he is a great one. We have picked many corners the past two years and could have a couple of reallyyoung ones. I wouldn't use the #2 pick on one
In defense of the Mckenzie pick he's a small guy that has elite kick returning ability which could be why they would bring him in as a 7th rounder.
I'm not following because this was your post:
I could only see drafting a DB with the first pick if this player was truly a standout compared to the rest of the 1st round picks and would be a true shutdown corner. If not, I would address a bigger need like Linebacker or a pass rusher.
Not making a big deal out of this, just saying 'not following' you.
I was commenting on that particular mock draft showing us taking a DB. but based on your above post, thought you were commenting on our #2. Anyway, no big deal.
I was taking about taking a DB with the #2 pick in the draft. I didn't see the mock draft but I don't see taking a DB with our first pick. I would be really surprised if the 49ers did. Of course, if you looked at 20 mock drafts you would see about 15 different players taken, lol
My bad. That was Allen I was thinking about having the medical issues
...and I'll just add that there are a couple of safeties highly ranked. Given how SF is modelling itself after Seattles defense, and we all saw how Earl Thomas is clearly that secondaries most important player, I wouldn't be opposed to grabbing one of them either.
The Niners have already invested a lot of high picks on safeties.
The Niners have already invested a lot of high picks on safeties.
That's very true.Based on what i've been seeing, i could believe Marshon Lattimore is close in value to Hooker and Adams. So if these guys pan out our BPA's, i'd take the CB. A top CB is harder to obtain.
That's very true.
With out going into the whole "lock down "CB debate, The Niners have had a real need for a true#1 CB for years.
Of course having a pass rush helps make all DB's better
Niner's seem snake bit, when it comes time to suckNo doubt, so it is unfortunate these DB's are in play at #2, as opposed to a QB or EDGE.
Yes because trading back has worked so well for the 9ers.Little trade rumor. We trade #2 pick to the Jets for their 1st,2nd and 4th. We give our 1st and a 6th.
I would do it.