- Thread starter
- #1
I'm of the belief that if they have to huddle about a scoring play... they should call the touchdown and then let the guy in the booth call a review. With all of these cameras, more often than not they're going to be able to really determine if it's a touchdown or not.
If this reaction was prompted by the Crabtree endzone catch, I think the huddle of the referees was the correct thing to do... The backjudge already threw his cap prior to the catch, meaning he already ruled that Crabtree went out of bounds. The huddle was to confer with the other officials what he ruled therefore ruling an illegal touch... Now if the replay officials showed the replay immediately after the call, the Niners could have challenged that but as it is, it was the correct procedure by the ground officials...
What I found interesting about the whole Crabtree non-TD catch, was the lack of a back-line, end-zone replay. I think that is the first time I have seen such a thing.
Yeah, it wasn't until two or three minutes later that they showed a replay where it looked like he didn't step out of bounds. If it took that long for us to see it then they probably didn't have it in the coaching booth either.
Yeah, it wasn't until two or three minutes later that they showed a replay where it looked like he didn't step out of bounds. If it took that long for us to see it then they probably didn't have it in the coaching booth either.
Yeah, the delay, that was strange as well. I watched that one several times and I agree, it does look like his foot stayed in bounds, but the angle makes it impossible to be certain. In or out, it was very close.
Another one for the conspiracists, maybe there is video that overturns the ruling on the field in which was intentionally kept from Harbaugh and burned. I know, too far, but I'm still surprised that there were only two camera angles. It was the second or third play from the red zone, not the first.
Haha, indeed! I only saw one replay angle, were there two replay angles? Or are you referring to the live angle and the one replay angle?
I was disappointed with the non challenge regardless because we were talking about a TD catch here, not some 5-yd out at midfield, so a challenge to what ultimately would have led to a TD versus a timeout taken in a game that we were starting to seize control in had it swung the other way.
I was disappointed with the non challenge regardless because we were talking about a TD catch here, not some 5-yd out at midfield, so a challenge to what ultimately would have led to a TD versus a timeout taken in a game that we were starting to seize control in had it swung the other way.
Well, coaches usually see the replay when we do I think. And Fox didn't even show the replay until 3-4 plays later. And, even with that one crappy angle they did show... there wasn't enough evidence to show that he didn't step out of bounds. If that is the only shot they had, it wouldn't have been overturned.
What I found interesting about the whole Crabtree non-TD catch, was the lack of a back-line, end-zone replay. I think that is the first time I have seen such a thing.
Exactly what i was thinking, if the NFL wants to get every call right especially scoring plays. You would think they would be well prepared at every stadium with every camera angle possible. Its unexcusable IMO.
Exactly what i was thinking, if the NFL wants to get every call right especially scoring plays. You would think they would be well prepared at every stadium with every camera angle possible. Its unexcusable IMO.