MAIZEandBLUE09
Well-Known, and Feared, Member
Yes, the B10 is the defendant. And they're going to keep meeting minimum requirements of the court until this is tossed. Anyone can sue anyone, and it's likely even in the most frivolous lawsuits that the court is going to ask for some kind of documentation. The B10 isn't going to hand over anything more than they have to and they're going to take every bit of the time the court gives them. The fact that it hasn't been thrown out yet doesn't validate the lawsuit, and you seem to think it does. My guess is the B10 might even have a plan for when to start playing by the time this thing hits September 12th.If it were frivolous the judge would have "thrown it out" day 1.
You're an ignorant moron to think the judge is only requiring 'basic documents'.
The Big 10 is a defendant. A defendant in a COURT.
They extend NOTHING on their own. They tell NOBODY (the plaintiff or the judge) what they're going to do. They can simply request an extension from the judge. She has no obligation to give it to them.
You then go on to imply the Big 10 is playing games with a court (judge). That is a really bad idea.
If so, then next up comes "contempt".
Wouldn't that be a headline of beauty?
"Big 10 held in contempt for snubbing their sanctimonious nose at judge"
.
If not, they'll hand over whatever documents are necessary to fulfil their requirement, which will illustrate the same vote that we already know about and tha'ts going to be the end of it.