fightinfunbags
Well-Known Member
True. I don’t know why one would overpay a RB though. For me this is a no brainer. I value Conklin over Chubb for next contract. RBs don’t age nearly as well as OTs do. The replacement cost is much lower at RB as well. RB is a position where you can justify getting 75% in savings while only giving up 10-15% of the production that would have been realized by the more expensive player.They will finally pay the piper next year though. Whether it be in Chubb or Conklin etc. Eventually paying your qb costs you some guys.