My 2016 NFL Predictions.

[PhilSimms11]

6 new division winners.
5 new playoff teams (marked with *).

AFC East
(2)NE (11-5)
BUF (7-9)
NYJ (7-9)
MIA (4-12)

AFC North
(1)PIT (12-4)
CIN (8-8)
BAL (7-9)
CLE (5-11)

AFC South
(4)TEN (10-6)*
(5)IND (10-6)*
HOU (7-9)
JAX (6-10)

AFC West
(3)OAK (11-5)*
(6)KC (10-6)
DEN (8-8)
SD (6-10)
----------
NFC East
(4)NYG (10-6)*
DAL (8-8)
WAS (7-9)
PHI (4-12)

NFC North
(1)GB (12-4)
MIN (9-7)
CHI (8-8)
DET (4-12)

NFC South
(3)CAR (11-5)
(6)TB (10-6)*
ATL (7-9)
NO (6-10)

NFC West
(2)SEA (12-4)
(5)ARZ (11-5)
LA (5-11)
SF (3-13)

Who's with me?

 

[RP-29]

Which games do you have GB losing?

 

[PDay8810]

new year, same prediction for the NFC east
shocking,

 

[PhilSimms11]

new year, same prediction for the NFC east
shocking,

Oh, sorry. I should have picked the Cowboys.

 

[PhilSimms11]

Which games do you have GB losing?

@MIN, NYG, IND, @TEN.

 

[Scooby-Doo]

6 new division winners.
5 new playoff teams (marked with *).

AFC East
(2)NE (11-5)
BUF (7-9)
NYJ (7-9)
MIA (4-12)

AFC North
(1)PIT (12-4)
CIN (8-8)
BAL (7-9)
CLE (5-11)

AFC South
(4)TEN (10-6)*
(5)IND (10-6)*
HOU (7-9)
JAX (6-10)

AFC West
(3)OAK (11-5)*
(6)KC (10-6)
DEN (8-8)
SD (6-10)
----------
NFC East
(4)NYG (10-6)*
DAL (8-8)
WAS (7-9)
PHI (4-12)

NFC North
(1)GB (12-4)
MIN (9-7)
CHI (8-8)
DET (4-12)

NFC South
(3)CAR (11-5)
(6)TB (10-6)*
ATL (7-9)
NO (6-10)

NFC West
(2)SEA (12-4)
(5)ARZ (11-5)
LA (5-11)
SF (3-13)

Who's with me?

You are really high on TEN.

Not that I disagree, but what games do you have the Cards losing?

 

[RP-29]

@MIN, NYG, IND, @TEN.

Giants, Colts and Titans were all in the bottom quarter of the league in PPG allowed last year. IND and NYG were both also at the bottom in yards allowed. The Packers' three non-divisional losses last year were @DEN, @CAR, @ARI.

Predicting the Giants and Colts to come into Lambeau with their shoddy defenses and inconsistent offenses and outscore the Packers is pretty bold.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

I'd be fine with another playoff appearance. I'll be annoyed if it isn't a division title.

 

[Broncos6482]

I'd be fine with another playoff appearance. I'll be annoyed if it isn't a division title.

Prepare to be annoyed then because the Broncos will be standing at the top of the division again when all is said and done!

 

[PhilSimms11]

You are really high on TEN.

Not that I disagree, but what games do you have the Cards losing?

@BUF, @CAR, @MIN, SEA (2).

 

[PhilSimms11]

Giants, Colts and Titans were all in the bottom quarter of the league in PPG allowed last year. IND and NYG were both also at the bottom in yards allowed. The Packers' three non-divisional losses last year were @DEN, @CAR, @ARI.

Predicting the Giants and Colts to come into Lambeau with their shoddy defenses and inconsistent offenses and outscore the Packers is pretty bold.

That was last year.

 

[Scooby-Doo]

@BUF, @CAR, @MIN, SEA (2).

I guess that's why we call them predictions.

 

[PhilSimms11]

I guess that's why we call them predictions.

Yes, indeed. I guarantee nothing.

 

[SoCalWizFan]

I would be completely shocked if the Titans are 10-6 this season. They only won 3 games last year - they are going to somehow win 7 more in a season where Luck returns & the rest of the division is better?

I see them being favored in one or maybe two home games (CLE & maybe JAX). The road schedule is somewhat easier but still involves games at MIA, CHI, KC & SD in addition to their division rivals. Really have a hard time seeing 10 wins in all of that (especially when yes they have more talent but it is very young & prone to mistakes & in need of more experience).

 

[Fountain City Blues]

Prepare to be annoyed then because the Broncos will be standing at the top of the division again when all is said and done!

Nuh uh

 

[Broncos6482]

Nuh uh

Yuh huh!

 

[RP-29]

That was last year.

True. Last year the entire Packers' WR and OL corps were M*A*S*H units, Lacy was fatter than Gilbert Brown, had to start an OLB and rookie at ILB and had to start two rookies at CB. Even with another plague of injuries, GB should still log one of the best records in the league because they have the softest schedule in the league this year.

If the Packers lose a non-divisional home game this year, it isn't going to be against the Giants or Colts, it'd be to the charmed Seahawks [who always seem to pull of a late-game miracle against the Pack] or disgruntled Cowboys [who are still pissed about the controversial 2014 playoff loss].

 

[Clayton]

AFC East
(2)NE (11-5)
BUF (9-7)
MIA (8-8)
NYJ (5-11)

AFC North
(1)PIT (13-3)
CIN (9-7)
BAL (6-10)
CLE (4-12)

AFC South
(4)HOU (10-6)
IND (8-8)
JAX (6-10)
TEN (6-10)

AFC West
(3)KC (10-6)
DEN (10-6)
OAK (10-6)*
SD (5-11)
----------
NFC East

(4)
(3)DAL (10-6)*
NYG (8-8)
WAS (7-9)
PHI (6-10)

NFC North
(4)GB (10-6)
MIN (9-7)
DET (8-8)
CHI (7-9)

NFC South
(2)CAR (11-5)
ATL (10-6) *
TB (7-9)
NO (5-11)

NFC West
(1)ARZ (12-4)
SEA (10-6)
LA (6-10)
SF (4-12)

 

[sonnyblack65]

Which games do you have GB losing?

GB is a great team at Lambeau 1 loss max is my prediction, unless Rodgers gets injured and I doubt they lose at Tenn in a shootout. Rodgers vs Mariota at the helm hmmm

 

[Tech_God]

@BUF, @CAR, @MIN, SEA (2).

I'd love for Seattle to win both games against the Cards but man, a split in my opinion.