Mike Wallace or Percy Harvin

[The Foot]

Mike Wallace or Percy Harvin who would you rather have.

 

[kramer1]

Wallace. All day. Twice on Sunday's.

 

[TREFF]

Harvin. . Just have to hope he plays most weeks

 

[kramer1]

Harvin. . Just have to hope he plays most weeks

Wallace - 246 and 3

Harvin - 106 and 0

Case closed.

 

[The Foot]

What say you to that Treff?

 

[The Foot]

You to guys are the perfect two guys to debate this. I won't say who i am leaning with but am looking forward to Treff"s response to Kramer's

 

[kramer1]

You to guys are the perfect two guys to debate this. I won't say who i am leaning with but am looking forward to Treff"s response to Kramer's

I'm drunk too. So, it could be entertaining at the very least.

 

[The Foot]

lol oh I know it will!

 

[TREFF]

You to guys are the perfect two guys to debate this. I won't say who i am leaning with but am looking forward to Treff"s response to Kramer's

Dudes been in my ignore list for a good month. I briefly took him off to respond to his inquiry into the B league opening. . But right back in he went. . So no idea what he said. . Nor do I care

 

[The Foot]

Oh I didn't know that

 

[The Foot]

Treff would mind elaborating on why you would rather have Harvin, if you get a chance.

 

[kramer1]

I guess he doesn't like me. I'm not mad at him. It takes time for people to get used to Kramer. He'll come around.

The better play is Wallace, though.

When talking about WR's we have to look at a number of things. First and foremost; stats to date (performance). Second, height. Third, speed. Fourth QB. Fifth, matchup.

 

[TREFF]

Treff would mind elaborating on why you would rather have Harvin, if you get a chance.

Better QB, better route runner, better natural athlete, the team schemes numerous ways to get him the ball. . Running, receiving, trick plays, whatever it takes.

Wallace is really fast. .. and that's about it.
The one thing I'd give him over Harvin.. he's more likely to play 16 games. . Which is a huge deal, no doubts about it, but I'd take Harvin for as long as I can have him out there

 

[The Foot]

Thanks

 

[Psych-Ward]

Wallace. All day. Twice on Sunday's.

I'm drunk too. So, it could be entertaining at the very least.

That expains that!!!

 

[The Foot]

How about this>

Harvin
Palmer

for

Wallace
RG3
Cussins

does this make a difference or would you chose a diferent side with these other guys in there?

 

[kramer1]

How about this>

Harvin
Palmer

for

Wallace
RG3
Cussins

does this make a difference or would you chose a diferent side with these other guys in there?

I don't see how this makes any difference. The 2 QB side probably drops one right off the bat anyways unless it's a 2 QB start league. Palmer is such a Dandy too. That guy gets hurt if he lets out a stiff fart.

 

[TREFF]

Not really. . Although both QB's hold more value than Palmer if we're talking about your dynasty.. but in reality neither is a great fantasy QB... unless RGIII finds a new home with a coach who tailors his offense for his skill set. I guess if your talking LONG term. . The QB's shift the scales enough. . But it ain't by much

 

[kramer1]

I think the difference between TReff's opinion's and mine are that he's always looking long term and I'm more of a "bird in the hand" guy. I want to win now. I'll worry about tomorrow tomorrow.

 

[tlance]

How about this>

Harvin
Palmer

for

Wallace
RG3
Cussins

does this make a difference or would you chose a diferent side with these other guys in there?

Harvin is the better player, but he is somewhat limited by the fact that the Seahawks are such a great team. They do not need to feature him as much as the Dolphins need to feature Wallace. I think it is a toss up between the 2 players, but when you add in the keeper potential for the Redskin QBs over Palmer, it tips the scales to the Wallace side. An long as you have somebody to drop, I take Wallace and the Redskins. Palmer could be finished.