- Thread starter
- #1
redseat
Well-Known Member
With the exceptions if Bye week...
Who do I start Tua or Hurts?
Who do I start Tua or Hurts?
With the exceptions if Bye week...
Who do I start Tua or Hurts?
if you own hurts you should always start him... no matter what... Tua does make it difficult, but if you start playing the guessing game, you will likely lose points... not gain...
on my rankings Tua has a bad matchup this week, so he may not even be on my top 10... dont know for sure, as i didnt actually do rankings yet
Vikings defense is not good, bro. Not at this point, anyway. And going into Philly's home opener with no running game?Not a problem I would want to have, why did you even draft both?
Trade one to the guy with Rodgers?
Eagles aren't going to fix the offense in 3 days. How bad do you think the Vikings defense is?...
Maybe Belichek is the issue here and if you start Tua you'll be facing him both weeks...
Not a problem I would want to have, why did you even draft both?
Trade one to the guy with Rodgers?
Eagles aren't going to fix the offense in 3 days. How bad do you think the Vikings defense is?...
Maybe Belichek is the issue here and if you start Tua you'll be facing him both weeks...
Someone explain to me a league where both are available.With the exceptions if Bye week...
Who do I start Tua or Hurts?
You were fortunate not to take Allen.
As far as QBs go, stick with whom you have.![]()
Hurts was early round pick and Tua was a mid round pick in most leagues that I drafted in. Easily could get both if that was your priority.Someone explain to me a league where both are available.
Hurts was early round pick and Tua was a mid round pick in most leagues that I drafted in. Easily could get both if that was your priority.
Right.
The issue is that taking both should not have been the priority.
When one invests an early round pick in a QB, it is a waste of resources to double down and take another a couple rounds later.
I think that is why people here are confused.
But I also remember that @redseat used to auto draft a lot, and this is exactly the kind of thing that happens to auto draft teams.
Right.
The issue is that taking both should not have been the priority.
When one invests an early round pick in a QB, it is a waste of resources to double down and take another a couple rounds later.
I think that is why people here are confused.
But I also remember that @redseat used to auto draft a lot, and this is exactly the kind of thing that happens to auto draft teams.