Are you actually telling me, you don't know a catchers peak hitting years are from 29-34 and have been for a long time...please, tell me that...because its common knowledge that catchers work more on defense and in history develop as a hitter later than other positions...and yes players bodies do break down more in their 30's...also common knowledge in baseball history....I really thought you knew stuff beyond the Tigers baseball team.
Molina wasn't worth 15 mil when he signed his contract either (molina a perfect example of history of hitting for catchers by the way)...contracts are based on what they plan on them doing.
found it...you have now joined Vice as the only two to make the club...
McCann has been injured part of the last 2 seasons?....a catcher who will hit 20 to 25 hr and hit .250 to .290....he also had strikeout kings Uggla and Upton batting behind him, why pitch to him..do you say Matt Wieters is a better catcher? look at boths stats again
I called this a week ago on the MLB daily thread...1st step of the Yankees Youth movement...30 to 35, lol.
Molina is a 7 time gold glove catcher, who is arguably the best defensive catcher in baseball. He signed his contract extension before last season, after hitting .305 with an OPS+ of 124.
McCann has hit for power, but the last two years, he has hit .230 and .256. So a career average of .277 looks good, but if you hit 47 and 21 points beneath it the last two years -- it doesn't look that good.
Yes. Wieters is one of the best defensive catchers in baseball, and is just entering his prime. He'll never be the hitter McCann is, but defense is so much more important. But Wieters wasn't available to the Yankees, so I don't see the relevance of the comparison.
In all fairness though, MLB batting averages recently are a good 15 or so points lower than what they were a few years ago. In 2013, the MLB average was .253 (just a few years ago it was nearing .270) and the average catcher hit .245 with a .698 OPS...so with a weak free agent field, you'd expect McCann to get $15M+ a year (I was expecting 4 years/$60M but obviously the Yankees got far more desperate than that).
My guess is that the Yankees will hope they can catch him a good 80-100 games then have him DH a good amount to try to keep him healthier and have his bat in the lineup as much as possible....the obvious issue is that they've whether Jeter/A-Rod will need to DH some with their recent injuries, so that plan could go to sh1t if that's the case.
McCann's OBP is 31 points higher, his SLG% is 53 points higher, and his OPS+ is 19 points higher. Those are some pretty big differences.
Dont believe it. No way you pay a catcher almost $20M a season, who bats .256 before heading to the AL east pitching barage
Hate to break it to you, but AL East pitching wasn't all that strong last year. The best AL East staff last year (Boston) was 8th in the majors in ERA+, and only 1 other team in the division (NYY) was in the top 15 in MLB in ERA+
I don't get how this became a Weiters Vs McCann issue.
McCann is winding down his career and Weiters is going into his prime. The Yankees have a habit of paying top dollar for Veterans that are looking for their last payday and it bites them in the ass more often than not. When New York makes a solid trade like acquiring Granderson they have better results.
McCann at that payday will not out produce guys by enough to make it worthwhile. He is a good catcher but so was Martin just earlier in their careers.
I like the fact the Yankees pay for previous production it keeps saddling them with A Rods, Texiaras, Pavanos, and Swishers of MLB.