LOL @ Minnesota Here

[michaeljordan_fan]

You don't get out much, do you? You live in your mother's basement? lol


Simple. The accuser/finger pointer/heckler is ALWAYS put on trial. If you can't handle that simple fact, you need to give this up.

Put on trial for what?

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

This is the LOL @ Minnesota thread. I don't bring up Minnesota in threads unrelated to them.

You feel the need to bring up Oregon in threads completely unrelated to them.

AP voters were asked by 247 sports which Trophy/Rivalry Games were their favorites, and this is the results


#1 - Paul Bunyun's Axe. That is Minnesota vs Wisconsin.
#2 - Floyd of Rosedale. That is Minnesota vs Iowa.
#3 - Little Brown Jug. That is Minnesota vs Michigan.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Put on trial for what?

You are in a sense, a heckler. No heckler ever simply gets away with heckling without the light being shone on them and their being responded to.

If you can't handle it, you shouldn't be in the heckling business, chump.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

You are in a sense, a heckler. No heckler ever simply gets away with heckling without the light being shone on them and their being responded to.

If you can't handle it, you shouldn't be in the heckling business, chump.

If you want to change the topic to a different team, start a thread on that team. Your deflection is transparent.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

If you want to change the topic to a different team, start a thread on that team. Your deflection is transparent.

Mr Basement dweller, get out once in a while, because you have no clue how the world works.

Now I suppose you will go and cry to the Admins and whine and beg for them to come down on me for not playing the game by YOUR ridiculous rules?

And how am I deflecting? You accused UMn of being a punching bag for the past 50 years, and I've shown you many examples of how they have not been a punching bag for the past 50 years. They've had a few good seasons, they've whooped up on Oregon, they've produced several Award winners and have had several Natl Leading performances, and the reason they have not performed as well the last 50 years is a righteous reason, quite the opposite compared to Oregon and it's reason for finally starting to perform better than like crap.

UMn's NEVER had to rely on the ill gotten gains of a slave labor kingpin who produces something as worthless as over priced shoes.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

Mr Basement dweller, get out once in a while, because you have no clue how the world works.

Now I suppose you will go and cry to the Admins and whine and beg for them to come down on me for not playing the game by YOUR ridiculous rules?

And how am I deflecting? You accused UMn of being a punching bag for the past 50 years, and I've shown you many examples of how they have not been a punching bag for the past 50 years. They've had a few good seasons, they've whooped up on Oregon, they've produced several Award winners and have had several Natl Leading performances, and the reason they have not performed as well the last 50 years is a righteous reason, quite the opposite compared to Oregon and it's reason for finally starting to perform better than like crap.

UMn's NEVER had to rely on the ill gotten gains of a slave labor kingpin who produces something as worthless as over priced shoes.

Minnesota is a punching bag, and is on trial here.

If you want to put Oregon on trial, that's fine. You don't add it to the existing case, you create a new one.

You have no clue how the world works.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Minnesota is a punching bag, and is on trial here.

If you want to put Oregon on trial, that's fine. You don't add it to the existing case, you create a new one.

You have no clue how the world works.

Oh really? So the Defense Attorney never cross examines witnesses? lol Witnesses testimony or their own reliability is never tested or called into question? Wow, you don't have TV down in that basement? lol

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

Oh really? So the Defense Attorney never cross examines witnesses? lol Witnesses testimony or their own reliability is never tested or called into question? Wow, you don't have TV down in that basement? lol

If you wanted to call my credibility into question, that would be relevant. Bringing Oregon into the mix would cause an objection, which would be sustained.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Found a rating system that ranks UMn as the 11th best cfb program of ALL-TIME.

 

[Wamu]

Found a rating system that ranks UMn as the 11th best cfb program of ALL-TIME.

And where did you find that 'list", at fredsdeadfriend-.com? Here are 11 CFB program's I'd rank ahead of Minnesota. In no order.


-Ohio State

-Nebraska

-Penn State

-N.D.

-The U

-FSU

-Bama

-USC

-Oklahoma

-Texas

-meeeechegan


Some articles for you that you'll without a doubt ignore.


247sports-.com: ranking college football's 25 best programs all time (minnesota isn't in the top 25)

espn-.com: the 50 best CFB programs over 150 years (they have minnesota # 29)

collegefootballnews-.com: AP cfb rankings- greatest programs of all time (they have minnesota # 32)

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

And where did you find that 'list", at fredsdeadfriend-.com? Here are 11 CFB program's I'd rank ahead of Minnesota. In no order.


-Ohio State

-Nebraska

-Penn State

-N.D.

-The U

-FSU

-Bama

-USC

-Oklahoma

-Texas

-meeeechegan


Some articles for you that you'll without a doubt ignore.


247sports-.com: ranking college football's 25 best programs all time (minnesota isn't in the top 25)

espn-.com: the 50 best CFB programs over 150 years (they have minnesota # 29)

collegefootballnews-.com: AP cfb rankings- greatest programs of all time (they have minnesota # 32)

The ranking I am referencing has 9 of the 11 you listed in the Top 10. So it agrees with you about those 9 teams. Fsu and Miami(the U?) are the ones he doesn't agree with you about.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

And where did you find that 'list", at fredsdeadfriend-.com? Here are 11 CFB program's I'd rank ahead of Minnesota. In no order.


-Ohio State

-Nebraska

-Penn State

-N.D.

-The U

-FSU

-Bama

-USC

-Oklahoma

-Texas

-meeeechegan


Some articles for you that you'll without a doubt ignore.


247sports-.com: ranking college football's 25 best programs all time (minnesota isn't in the top 25)

espn-.com: the 50 best CFB programs over 150 years (they have minnesota # 29)

collegefootballnews-.com: AP cfb rankings- greatest programs of all time (they have minnesota # 32)

He's got Tenn at #10, UMn at #11, Georgia at #12, FSU at #20 and Miami at #22.


He made up Top 25 rankings for the years 1901-1935, approximating what the AP poll in those years would have been and of course UMn faired quite well during that period
of time.

 

[Wamu]

The ranking I am referencing has 9 of the 11 you listed in the Top 10. So it agrees with you about those 9 teams. Fsu and Miami(the U?) are the ones he doesn't agree with you about.

You said Minnesota is # 11 all time. I gave you three different sites that don't have your team ranked that high. Homer on! It's all you ever do.

So exactly which "site" are you saying has the Gophers as the 11th best CFB program of all time? You claim someone out there has them at # 11. But to no surprise you didn't mention where you go that so called info from.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

And where did you find that 'list", at fredsdeadfriend-.com? Here are 11 CFB program's I'd rank ahead of Minnesota. In no order.


-Ohio State

-Nebraska

-Penn State

-N.D.

-The U

-FSU

-Bama

-USC

-Oklahoma

-Texas

-meeeechegan


Some articles for you that you'll without a doubt ignore.


247sports-.com: ranking college football's 25 best programs all time (minnesota isn't in the top 25)

espn-.com: the 50 best CFB programs over 150 years (they have minnesota # 29)

collegefootballnews-.com: AP cfb rankings- greatest programs of all time (they have minnesota # 32)

And where did you find that 'list", at fredsdeadfriend-.com? Here are 11 CFB program's I'd rank ahead of Minnesota. In no order.


-Ohio State

-Nebraska

-Penn State

-N.D.

-The U

-FSU

-Bama

-USC

-Oklahoma

-Texas

-meeeechegan


Some articles for you that you'll without a doubt ignore.


247sports-.com: ranking college football's 25 best programs all time (minnesota isn't in the top 25)

espn-.com: the 50 best CFB programs over 150 years (they have minnesota # 29)

collegefootballnews-.com: AP cfb rankings- greatest programs of all time (they have minnesota # 32)

And Billingsley has Minnesota ranked #17 or #18. All depends on what the creator of the system uses as criteria. The ones you listed often devalue accomplishments of the past as they are trying to sell magazines or now days they want more clicks so they purposely engineer their rating systems to highlight teams people are following now over teams whose best days are in the past.

Billingsley's and this guy's systems are designed not to show favoritism of that sort.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

You said Minnesota is # 11 all time. I gave you three different sites that don't have your team ranked that high. Homer on! It's all you ever do.

So exactly which "site" are you saying has the Gophers as the 11th best CFB program of all time? You claim someone out there has them at # 11. But to no surprise you didn't mention where you go that so called info from.

Page is up on my laptop. I'm at work so can't access my laptop now. But as ALWAYS, I can provide the source.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

You said Minnesota is # 11 all time. I gave you three different sites that don't have your team ranked that high. Homer on! It's all you ever do.

So exactly which "site" are you saying has the Gophers as the 11th best CFB program of all time? You claim someone out there has them at # 11. But to no surprise you didn't mention where you go that so called info from.

It has tOSU at #3.

 

[Wamu]

And Billingsley has Minnesota ranked #17 or #18. All depends on what the creator of the system uses as criteria. The ones you listed often devalue accomplishments of the past as they are trying to sell magazines or now days they want more clicks so they purposely engineer their rating systems to highlight teams people are following now over teams whose best days are in the past.

Billingsley's and this guy's systems are designed not to show favoritism of that sort.

You said this.

Found a rating system that ranks UMn as the 11th best cfb program of ALL-TIME.

So post a direct link to the site or article that says Minnesota is # 11 all time in CFB. Just going by what you said. Is it possible you're once again over-pimping your team?

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

He's got Tenn at #10, UMn at #11, Georgia at #12, FSU at #20 and Miami at #22.


He made up Top 25 rankings for the years 1901-1935, approximating what the AP poll in those years would have been and of course UMn faired quite well during that period
of time.

1901-1935 LMAO!!!!

 

[Wamu]

It has tOSU at #3.

I don't care where Ohio State's ranked. This isn't about the Buckeyes. This is about you saying Minnesota is the 11th best CFB program all time. The three articles I mentioned from 247-.com, espn-.com & collegefootballnews-.com don't have them ranked that high.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

1901-1935 LMAO!!!!

Yes, cfb existed before 1936. Duh