LOL @ Minnesota Here

[Wamu]

1901-1935 LMAO!!!!

Exactly.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

I don't care where Ohio State's ranked. This isn't about the Buckeyes. This is about you saying Minnesota is the 11th best CFB program all time. The three articles I mentioned from 247-.com, espn-.com & collegefootballnews-.com don't have them ranked that high.

Those you listed have biased self interests

 

[Wamu]

Those you listed have biased self interests

Oh really? But you don't have a biased self interest right? You trying to say Minnesota's the 11th best CFB program all time is continuing proof that you're more full of shit than a clogged toilet.

I asked you to back your statement up. Post something legit that has your team # 11 all time but you can't. And all you can do is say others are biased? Just classic. Don't ever change. You're a nonstop source of laughter.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Oh really? But you don't have a biased self interest right? You trying to say Minnesota's the 11th best CFB program all time is continuing proof that you're more full of shit than a clogged toilet.

I asked you to back your statement up. Post something legit that has your team # 11 all time but you can't. And all you can do is say others are biased? Just classic. Don't ever change. You're a nonstop source of laughter.

I said the page is up on my laptop, DUH. I'll send it when I can. But SO typical of a loser like you are to call it in question so quickly

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

Yes, cfb existed before 1936. Duh

Yale was much better than Um. Where are they on your list?

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Yale was much better than Um. Where are they on your list?

It's not "my list".

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Yale was much better than Um. Where are they on your list?

Oregon is #42.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Yale was much better than Um. Where are they on your list?

This question sort of exposes your ignorance.

 

[Wamu]

Bragging about accomplishments from the 1930's and earlier. Minnesota hasn't won a national title in 61 years.

@fredsdeadfriend

Good news! Next week the history channel is running a three show series on all things Gophers football.

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

This question sort of exposes your ignorance.

How is it ignorant to say Yale was better than Um, from 1900-1935?

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

Here are all the recognized Champions. We have any Yale or Princeton fans in here?

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

How is it ignorant to say Yale was better than Um, from 1900-1935?

Well, UMn won arguably 6 Nattie's in that time frame. I don't remember Yale doing that.

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

Well, UMn won arguably 6 Nattie's in that time frame. I don't remember Yale doing that.

Notice you said arguably.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

View attachment 281169
Here are all the recognized Champions. We have any Yale or Princeton fans in here?

How many of those Yale titles were from before 1901?

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Notice you said arguably.

Yes, I always acknowledge that there were many seasons with more than one declared Champion. I usually stick with Recognized Titles of which UMn has 6.

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

How many of those Yale titles were from before 1901?

In the specific timeframe Yale had 3 & Um had 2.
Bragging about 1900-1935 is the same as bragging about the 1800’s. So ya Yale & Princeton are the shit in your book.
Here ya go:

THE definitive national champ for each season, 1869-2019

Or the closest thing to it, based on historical consensus. We’ll also do a final count at the end.

www.bannersociety.com

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Oh really? But you don't have a biased self interest right? You trying to say Minnesota's the 11th best CFB program all time is continuing proof that you're more full of shit than a clogged toilet.

I asked you to back your statement up. Post something legit that has your team # 11 all time but you can't. And all you can do is say others are biased? Just classic. Don't ever change. You're a nonstop source of laughter.

Top College Football Programs of All Time

www.tiptop25.com

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

Top College Football Programs of All Time

www.tiptop25.com

Ok - that was last century. Here is this century.

College football's 10 superpowers of the 21st century

.

247sports.com

USC | Sporting News

www.sportingnews.com

 

[wazzu31]

And where did you find that 'list", at fredsdeadfriend-.com? Here are 11 CFB program's I'd rank ahead of Minnesota. In no order.


-Ohio State

-Nebraska

-Penn State

-N.D.

-The U

-FSU

-Bama

-USC

-Oklahoma

-Texas

-meeeechegan


Some articles for you that you'll without a doubt ignore.


247sports-.com: ranking college football's 25 best programs all time (minnesota isn't in the top 25)

espn-.com: the 50 best CFB programs over 150 years (they have minnesota # 29)

collegefootballnews-.com: AP cfb rankings- greatest programs of all time (they have minnesota # 32)

There is no way Army isn’t in the top 3 if Minnesota is on any list.

 

[fredsdeadfriend]

Oh really? But you don't have a biased self interest right?

Yes really. You don't know that magazines/sites like ESPN or 247 have biased self interests? They are money making companies. They can and often do pick stories because they are stories they think will get lots of magazines sold/lots of clicks on their sites. Choosing rating systems that highlight the accomplishments of a program like Minnesota while downplaying programs like Miami and FSU is not good for business, so they either rely on or create their own rating systems that make sure to high light the schools that are best for business.

Individuals like this guy, seem to come up with their systems as a way of highlighting teams/programs who deserve to be highlighted, regardless of how long ago the accomplishments took place and regardless of how many fans it might piss off or who it might make happy. I am not fully endorsing this guy or his rating, and it is HIS rating system, not mine, so not sure how you are claiming that I have some self interest involved? What? self interest in simply posting the results of someone else's research? And he didn't just throw this together over a weekend. I found this site over 2 years ago and he had only completed part of it. He was taking his time, I assumed to do a lot of research as he wrote about a lot of the reasons for the conclusions he came to and it would take a lot of research. And I don't see him trying to sell anything? So how is he doing it for self interests?