You frigging retard, you didn't even check out your source before posting it, did you? lol
There was a 250 million dollar jump from 2019 to 2020, so just clicking on the name Oregon, highlighted in blue, would take you to a page with more detailed information where it can be clearly seen that Oregon is counting some sort of 270 million dollar DONATION.
That's not revenue you nutjob. That's Uncle Phil buying a University and making it his slave so that they'll promote his product or some other friend of the University donating to them for whatever reason?
YES, it does. Unless like an idiot you didn't even click on the link? The Date is right there for any seeing person to see. lolI responded to a comment saying your info was 4 years old. Try to pay attention. What you posted in comment # 773 has no date on it. It could have been from any year.
Some of you dumb Oregon fans actually believed your University was bringing in over three hundred million dollars in athletic revenue a year hahaha!!!
Idiots
University Athletic Departments are funded by their football programs, for the most part, with only a few exceptions such as Minnesota who has THREE sports who make a profit.Seems like you are talking about non-football related stuff again.
At one time, back in the late 40s, and possibly THIS year? I mean our Women's CC team is ranked #7 or #6, and Oregon's wasn't even in the Top 30 last I checked.Minnesota track & field > Oregon track & field
YES, it does. Unless like an idiot you didn't even click on the link? The Date is right there for any seeing person to see. lol
I said "some". I was not specific regarding who those "some" were. And I was including Mr OSU who was being a temporary Oregon fan because it gave him a vehicle with which to give me a hard time.The link I provided did not state 300 million, but feel free to keep lying.
At one time, back in the late 40s, and possibly THIS year? I mean our Women's CC team is ranked #7 or #6, and Oregon's wasn't even in the Top 30 last I checked.
I wasn't referring to that link. I was referring to the one that I posted just before you made the crack about how I would NOT post anything recent. THAT article was dated from April of this year.You actually might be right. It says- projected FY17 revenues. So doesn't that FY stand for fiscal year? If so what you posted in from 2017. Not exactly something from this year.
I wasn't referring to that link. I was referring to the one that I posted just before you made the crack about how I would NOT post anything recent. THAT article was dated from April of this year.
LOL, we've had donors, you moron, how do you think we built our Stadium and our new Practice Facility?I'm sorry that Minnesota football has been too putrid for the past 60 years to attract wealthy donors.
Of course you weren't referring to your own link that was about 2017 when we're talking about revenue from last year. You're a real character.
YES, they are. Without a doubt. And yes, wrong topicMinnesota Gophers hockey is the best ever. Dammit, wrong topic.
University Athletic Departments are funded by their football programs, for the most part, with only a few exceptions such as Minnesota who has THREE sports who make a profit.
So talking about Athletics budgets in general, has a ton to do with football.
LOL, we've had donors, you moron, how do you think we built our Stadium and our new Practice Facility?
We just didn't include it in our athletic budget under revenues so as to fool people into thinking we were making tons of athletic revenue like Oregon apparently had no moral stance against doing.
@michaeljordan_fan
I think he's trying to say Minnesota track's better historically than Oregon. This could get real interesting.
I said "some". I was not specific regarding who those "some" were. And I was including Mr OSU who was being a temporary Oregon fan because it gave him a vehicle with which to give me a hard time.
He was acting like one, dumbass.He's not an Oregon fan, dumbass.