Yo Tee
Well-Known Member
Oddly by your list of stats Willie Parker is the best
Must have missed where Parker caught 50-60 balls for 600 yards.
Oddly by your list of stats Willie Parker is the best
Younger generations don't seem to understand this. We can debate all year long about it, but the Steelers have been a premier franchise in this league for many decades. And the business standards haven't changed.Bell is a want, not a need......
Oddly by your list of stats Willie Parker is the best because he didn't have the luxury of a top line like bell has had.
If your going to invest all your emotion in this, the Steelers are really going to let you down. They will not play games with Bell. They have let bigger and better players walk, Bell is no different. Only he's going to walk and find out like all others.....there is no place like the Burg.
Don't want to talk about '08 & '09 because that stench brought about the debates over Colbert as a GM. But looking at how the O-line draft picks from the '10 draft until now...
2010: Maurkice Pouncey, (1st Rd)
2011: Marcus Gilbert (2nd Rd)
2012: David Decastro (1st Rd), Kelvin Beachum (6th Rd) - DeCastro missed this entire season due to injury, and Gilbert was placed on IR in week 5.
So essentially their full returns on O-line investments didn't come about until 2013. Noteworthy - Foster was a UDFA in 2009, and started 6-7 games that year. And didn't gain the starting job until midway into the 2010 season.
It's easy to argue that the O-line played a major factor in these offensive rankings. And those higher rankings correlate to BOTH the investment in the O-line & the drafting of Bell. The O-line nucleus wasn't exactly developed until 2014. Then it took a hit after Beachum left.
Must have missed where Parker caught 50-60 balls for 600 yards.
Younger generations don't seem to understand this. We can debate all year long about it, but the Steelers have been a premier franchise in this league for many decades. And the business standards haven't changed.
Very true. Never disagreed with that. James Conner has proved "capable". His dependability is debatable given the injury history. But Bell has a bad injury history as well. Again, not saying anyone can replace Bell 100%. But can they win without him? Yes.O-line is obviously important but we need a capable RB in order to take advantage of it.
Paint it anyway you'd like......
Willie Parker also demanded a Shit ton of money, not Bell kind of money, but what happened to him????
The Washington Redskins happened to him.
James Conner has proved "capable"
There's no team out there that doesn't have an established RB already that wouldn't want Le'Veon Bell. We have a talent that really hasn't been seen in a while. A RB that can be a #1 RB and also rival many WR1s on half the teams in the NFL. If you restructure Ben's contract, cut some guys that aren't vital to this team and guys that you can actually replace in the draft or free agency and you will solve all the money problems. RBs have been catching passes for years but not to the extent to what they are in today's NFL. The RB position is evolving into a catch AND run position. If you can't use your RB as a good target for a reception as well than you don't have a very good RB.
Yes it obviously has, and the Steelers have changed right along with it. The Steelers are one of the most successful franchises in the NFL for a reason. That doesn't change by the coming or going of 1 player.Older generations don't seem to understand that the way football is played has changed.
O-line is obviously important but we need a capable RB in order to take advantage of it.
Yes it obviously has, and the Steelers have changed right along with it. The Steelers are one of the most successful franchises in the NFL for a reason. That doesn't change by the coming or going of 1 player.
Therein lies the meaning of "capability", or more importantly what it means to you. Hence why I put it in quotes. It takes a stretch of the imagination to think Conner can handle the job of a workhorse outright. I based my meaning on whether or not he can run the ball effectively. However limited his role was, he proved effective.How has this been proven? Where in the 3 games he played and 32 times he ran the ball did he prove to you that he's capable of taking over the starting RB spot?
That is a completely different debate my friend. The importance of a franchise QB is exceedingly more important than a top-level RB talent. That really isn't a debate.Tell that to the QB position. 2003, 6-10. Ben gets drafted. 14-0 and Super Bowl the following year. Cause and effect.
Therein lies the meaning of "capability", or more importantly what it means to you. Hence why I put it in quotes. It takes a stretch of the imagination to think Conner can handle the job of a workhorse outright. I based my meaning on whether or not he can run the ball effectively. However limited his role was, he proved effective.
That is a completely different debate my friend. The importance of a franchise QB is exceedingly more important than a top-level RB talent. That really isn't a debate.
Not true......
Bam Morris was relevant only in Pittsburgh
As was Barry Foster, Amtos Zereoue, Willie Parker.....the list goes on and on.....
It took Parker 3 years to turn back into a nothing RB, just the way we found him. His stats started declining after the 2007 season. So no, the Redskins didn't happen to him, he started sucking while still with us.
I've answered this question more than a handful of times already. Go back & read if you're that interested in my opinion. You clearly will never agree with it, so what's the point?
Short answer... Yes I'm confident. But that has more to do with my confidence in the O-line, regardless of what John Doe they have at RB.