The Derski
No Fat Chicks
Yes. I would vote for him, create alt accounts and vote even more.
No where does it state it has to be for the winning team. Although in most cases thats what happensHe deserves it if the finals mvp was for the best player in the series. Last time i checked, it was for the most valuable player in the winning team.
Itd funnt to see him win because of the outrage it would cause on here. The Lebron haters would have a field day.
See that's the thing. Curry has "done enough" but he hasnt been super impressive. Not a knock against him just a testament to how well GS plays as a team and unitWhy's that?
The question asked was if we thought he could win MVP on a losing team.
My answer was no because historically it just doesn't happen.
The thought of him winning, based on what we've seen in the series is far from outrageous, even though I think Curry has done enough assuming he continues to and the Warriors win.
If the Cavs were to win the series, there would be zero talk of Curry getting it on the losing team.
See that's the thing. Curry has "done enough" but he hasnt been super impressive. Not a knock against him just a testament to how well GS plays as a team and unit
I didnt necessarily mean you, i just meant people in geneal because you know ESPN would suck his dick (they are already) and people would just be more sick of him being an attention whoreAnd that's why I for sure wouldn't be outraged ( as you claimed) if James won it.
I just don't see it happening as of now.
Let's see what happens tonight ( and hopefully not Friday).
I didnt necessarily mean you, i just meant people in geneal because you know ESPN would suck his dick (they are already) and people would just be more sick of him being an attention whore
lebron is a putz.Itd funnt to see him win because of the outrage it would cause on here. The Lebron haters would have a field day.
Itd funnt to see him win because of the outrage it would cause on here. The Lebron haters would have a field day.
Itd funnt to see him win because of the outrage it would cause on here. The Lebron haters would have a field day.
Historically, it has happened.Why's that?
The question asked was if we thought he could win MVP on a losing team.
My answer was no because historically it just doesn't happen.
The thought of him winning, based on what we've seen in the series is far from outrageous, even though I think Curry has done enough assuming he continues to and the Warriors win.
If the Cavs were to win the series, there would be zero talk of Curry getting it on the losing team.
I bet youll be having fun busting all over himPersonally, I don't think he'll win it. Especially if the series ends tonight. However, I wouldn't complain if he did win it. He's put up some phenomenal numbers. His numbers, so far, are actually slightly better than what Jerry West put up when he won it from the losing team in 1969.
Besides, I'll be having too much fun busting on him for being 2-4 in the finals.
Historically, it has happened.
And where did I say it NEVER has?
Pop quiz.
How many Finals MVP's have there been?
How many came from the losing team?
Also, like I said earlier....I really couldn't care less if he wins it or not (assuming Warriors win).
I just don't think he will.
Define MVP
If Lebron wasn't on Cleveland, they would have more ping pong balls than any team in the NBA
With him, they are a game away from a Game 7
Sounds pretty valuable
And where did I say it NEVER has?
Pop quiz.
How many Finals MVP's have there been?
How many came from the losing team?
Also, like I said earlier....I really couldn't care less if he wins it or not (assuming Warriors win).
I just don't think he will.