Raw_Bee808
Gifted Member
LOL
Just spitballing for fun...Yeah, it's just for fun. What else is there to do in the offseason other than talk about value and speculate about potential teams?
I'm just an average NBA fan, never claimed to be a coach. Sorry if our discussion isn't good enough for you.
wtf....so you would say a player who isnt good, and a center in positionless basketball is a "good fit"You are ridiculous.
Both are bigs who can shoot. You absolutely need players who can defend bigs. Preferably skilled bigs like Horford who can allow allow you to stretch the floor.
And please, when did I ever say Wendell Carter was good? I said he fits what the Bulls are building. That is all.
Sexton or Ball? 5 years from now?Just spitballing for fun...
wtf....so you would say a player who isnt good, and a center in positionless basketball is a "good fit"
lol...dude.....cmon now. seems contradictory. I mean- if your analysis was as well thought out as "uhhh da bulls dont have a big guy so it was good they drafted a tall player" then huuuuuraaaaaah
crucicied myself? mccaw sucked balls. lolHave you actually seen Carter play?
He is not a traditional center. His closest comparison is Al Horford, who is also not a traditional center at all and yes, Horford is the perfect big for a positionless system.
The Bulls now have 2 bigs who can shoot. I don't think the team will be all that good but I like how the pieces fit. Kind of like how PJ Tucker fits well in Houston, or Horford in Boston. That doesn't mean they are great players.
But keep putting words in my mouth. You basically crucified yourself on a hill of stupidity in a semantic argument over Pat McCaw 2 years ago. I make no claims about the Bulls or Carter being good, but I do like the hypothetical fit if he pans out. There are a number of NBA analysts much smarter than you who agree with that though too.
But the reality is that you are again up to your old tricks attempting to change narratives to what you want them to be. Try to stay on topic here.
you think Ingram and Kuzma and a crappy first rounder is a "bounty of riches"? ...i just threw up in my mouth a little bitThe SPURS are now Kingmakers.
They essentially get to decide where Lebron goes, AND will get a bounty of riches for being the ones who pick it.
Not a bad situation honestly to be in. The Spurs are likely to come out really good in all of this.
Lebron is going to head to wherever San Antonio trades Kawhi. It is pretty obvious.
That offer from Philadelphia keesp getting better
I am starting to think the Philadelphia Eagles will have company in dreaming of Broad Street Parades.
LA is going to need to offer even more assets now than they first considered.
I may be in the minority, buy I think the best duo the Lakers could add would be JBJ and Cousins while keeping all their good young players. Boogie might average 30/20 with the attention James brings from the D
you think Ingram and Kuzma and a crappy first rounder is a "bounty of riches"? ...i just threw up in my mouth a little bit
crucicied myself? mccaw sucked balls. lol