PatsFan2003
Well-Known Member
- 35,835
- 7,850
- 533
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
You don't see the difference between someone talking about general season injuries and events that happen in that game?
Injuries aren't an 'excuse'. That's just what trolls and haters say when they have nothing else to counter with. Injuries are a part of the story. Already brought up Arizona long before you did and said Seattle was able to take full advantage of it. Also pointed out the Rams still won several games with a 3rd string QB as well. Sometimes injuries uncover diamonds in the rough. Injuries that happen in earlier weeks give you a chance to work on a game plan without them. Injuries in game do not. You have to adjust on the fly.
They happen to every team, but disproportionately.
Refs can be part of the story and it seems they were in a few earlier playoff games. At least that didn't happen here.
The ones that always get the debates are did that QB just play bad and throw a pick, or was the defense playing hard and caused it? It's those things that always have two sides and varying degrees. Injuries are fairly black and white. In a game that came down to 1 play lots of things went into it. Injuries for sure. Lane doesn't break his arm in the 1st and there is no doubt what so ever that NE gets less yards on that side. Major drop off going to Simon. Automatically mean a win? Well of course not, but sure would give you a lot better odds. Every play would be different so you can't say we get to that exact same last play. Could actually be worse with a lucky pass on Lane that goes the distance vs the dink and dunk vs the other guy.
I don't expect you to understand though. I think you are too young to really get it.
Sure... In the Superbowl with Charlotte, both of the Patriots starting safeties went down. Wilson hurt his hamstring and Rodney Harrison broke his arm.
You don't think it was all Jake Dellomme do you?
Still. It doesn't matter.