- Thread starter
- #1
Well, he has been about as effective/effecient an OLB as there is the past two years outside of an gimp elbow to close out 2013- not coincidently, that 2013 group fell off a cliff when Houston (and Hali) were out.Houston is a good player, sure, but that's way to much money for him.
Houston is a good player, sure, but that's way to much money for him.
This was my first impression as well, but I want to see details before I gush too much.No it's not.
The cap is jumping by incredible leaps and the new CBA has greatly reduced how much most teams spend on rookie contracts so there is actually a much bigger % of the cap that goes to vet contracts than there every has been.
This contract is going to be par for the course for keeping players like Houston moving forward.
At only 26 years old and with elite production already under his belt, Houston is one of the most valuable pieces in the league (that doesn't play QB). He deserves an elite deal and this is the new elite deal levels at the NFL. Hell IMO he might have actually accepted quite a bit little less than he could have gotten by just playing the tag out this year and doing this again next offseason.
This contract in terms of cap % is actually the exact same deal as Freeney signed for your Colt's back in the day and, unlike Houston who is coming off of one of the best years in the history of the league, Freeney was coming off a down year. And it's not like that Freeney contract was ever truly an albatross. The Colts still had money to keep an elite QB, two elite WR's, an elite safety (at least when signed), and fill in some gaps after that.
People get too carried away with saying that is too much money. That is NOT too much money for a pass rusher like Houston in today's league. KC fans should be very happy today IMO.
This was my first impression as well, but I want to see details before I gush too much.
Wagner^ sorry I had a good friend that spelt it the other way.Oops the price for Bobby Wagoneer just went up.
Wagner^ sorry I had a good friend that spelt it the other way.
Also I realize LBs fall into 3 catagories when they talk contracts. Suffice to say BW is one of the dominant ILB.
I swear I have seen QB contracts richer than that. How is this the second richest contract in NFL history with only a non-QB leading the way in Suh? Even at 6 years 101 million, that is only $16.8 million per year. Don't most the elite QB's make $20+ million a year, haven't several QB's signed contracts that were greater than $100 million? QB's that come to mind are: Manning, Brady, Rodgers, Flacco....hell even Andy Dalton signed a 6 year deal worth as much as $115 million a couple years ago. I don't understand. Are QB's just not part of the league anymore or what?
Just wait until Wilson and Luck get new contracts.
I agree but...I don't know. I watch his tape and I see a really good player but I don't see a franchise player. I think Poe is the best player on that defense and you could plug in pass rushers behind him.Great pass rushers cost a lot.
Calling him a linebacker instead of a pass rusher is really sports journalism at its worst. So friggin dramatic.