Mecca of the “B” Team
ClipGangOrDontBang
I 100% vehemently disagree. I have read plenty about David Stern and his tenure in the leauge and to act like he did not mold the league to his vision is complete and total bullshit. He took a fledgling league that had its Finals on tape delay and molded it into the vision which he saw for the league. thats the JOB of a commissioner. Simply enforcing rules is a minute part of what encompasses his job. The Commissioner DIRECTS where the league goes. If David Stern was a puppet that did little more than play vice principal the NBA would not be nearly what it is today---- Not that i agree with everything Stern did- but the reason you HAVE a Commissioner is someone with power and discretion to make the tough decisions when their just ARENT rules or circumstances or unintended things happen.
To act like the Commissioners job is to solely enforce rules is just so incredibly short sighted its ridiculous. The Owners pick this guy for a reason- and ESPECIALLY IN Sterns case- who amassed more power than any contemporary Commissioner in US Sports history by the time his decades long run was gone- he ABSOLUTELY is the #1 figure in shaping and molding the league to what it becomes. I dont even know how thats debatable to be honest.
Fair has nothing to do with it. Is it "fair" that the Cavs have 29 nationally televised games? Is it "fair" when Stern vetoes a trade of CP3 to the Lakers? Is it FAIR when he supplies the new owner of the Cavs with addittional first rounders because Ted Stepien had sunk the team? Is it fair to suspend Ron Artest for the length of time he did when the precedent that was previously set was just completely ignored?-- OF COURSE NOT- all those things were done becuase the Commissioner has discretion to implement his vision of what the league should be. Is it "fair" when the Commissioner mandates players wear suits on the bench that are not playing? Is that in the rules somewhere prior to the Commissioner institutiing it? OF COURSE NOT- the Commissioner SAW something- players looking like gansters on the bench- and made a decision that molded the league to his vision. It happens ALL THE TIME. Is it "fair" to take the All Star game out of Charlotte because of a couple politicians?-- OF COURSE NOT- but he did what he had to do to protect the league.
The Artest thing is a the perfect example. "Fair" is not why Artest got such a long drawn out suspension. He got his suspension because Stern felt he had to act in the best interest of the league and protect sponsorship. It screwed the Pacers- it wasnt fair- it didnt conform with previous precedent- not even CLOSE- but it was without a doubt in the best interest of the league.
There has to be literally DOZENS of examples like that which never see the light of day and are solely behind the scenes.
When extraordinary circumstance arise like i described above- the Commissioner acts - he isnt just a freaking traffic cop.
If all of this is true, what does it say about Stern's "Image" that he went in hard on Arrest, as he should have.
Yet, be allowed Sterling to remain a member of the club for decades?
He could only flex the power he was given by the people he worked for:
The Owners.
He wanted him out BAD but never went after him for fear of reprisal, from Sterling Lawsuits or the other Owners.
That makes him a well paid puppet imo...