- Thread starter
- #21
Omar 382
Well-Known Member
I just saw something and it reminded me of this thread. In "The Bill James Handbook 2014" there is a section called "Hall of Fame Monitor" that uses a complex formula (that would take Pythagorean to explain) that says who probably will and will not be a Hall of Famer. Basically, a score of 100 means that you are a sure fire Hall of Famer if you retire today. If you don't have 100, it doesn't mean that you aren't going to make the Hall, it just means you aren't a sure thing or that you have some more work to put in. The only active players with 100 points or more are: Ichiro Suzuki (109), Derek Jeter (147), Alex Rodriguez (177), Albert Pujols (158), and Miguel Cabrera (109).
Anyway, I was surprised to see the score Utley got. Only 53 points. Again, this isn't a perfect formula, but Bill James is a pretty smart guy. The gray area is around 70-100 points, so if you have less than 70 points, you probably aren't a Hall of Famer (at least not yet). Conversely, Rollins has 7 more points at 60, and Howard is sitting at 52. Paps with 46 points They are the only four current Phillies that had enough points to appear on this list.
I'm not quite sure what to make of this. I would think Utley would have more points than Rollins. On a side note, Halladay only has 55 points. I also think he will make the Hall.
Anyway, I was surprised to see the score Utley got. Only 53 points. Again, this isn't a perfect formula, but Bill James is a pretty smart guy. The gray area is around 70-100 points, so if you have less than 70 points, you probably aren't a Hall of Famer (at least not yet). Conversely, Rollins has 7 more points at 60, and Howard is sitting at 52. Paps with 46 points They are the only four current Phillies that had enough points to appear on this list.
I'm not quite sure what to make of this. I would think Utley would have more points than Rollins. On a side note, Halladay only has 55 points. I also think he will make the Hall.
Last edited by a moderator: