- Thread starter
- #1
Greg
Member
With Stephen Jones confirming that the team will let Murray hit the open market in FA to establish his contract worth on March 10th, you just have to wonder if the Cowboys already have some type of "end-run" gameplan already in mind concerning their ultimate payout and future vision of their RB position. With the current uncertainty in Minny and the words coming from AP's camp, his family, and his agent, towards them moving on from Minny, you almost have wonder if he is just waiting on his reinstatement to the league before things start to come into focus more clearer concerning his real intentions on leaving the Vikes. Does Jerry and Stephen (Garrett will have no choice but to accept their beliefs imo, as this is still Jerry's team), truly believe that they have a shot at AP via some sort of trade after he has been reinstated? I know the Vikes have gone on record as saying that they wouldn't trade him to Dallas, but what if AP refuses to play another game for them and demanded a trade after his reinstatement? Wouldn't they have to look at all the offers on the table in a trade for him? I am against giving up any draft picks for AP, but maybe, just maybe, Jerry and Stephen see things a different way? Romo has about another two to three year window before his team must begin to search for his replacement, could it be that Jerry may be thinking about going all in here after having that convo on his private bus with Romo? I mean, paying 8-10 Mil a season for Murray and guaranteeing money to a RB with issues staying healthy and holding onto the ball, versus waiting until the AP situation plays itself out to see if you can obtain AP for a similar asking price, may be a part of this posturing going on now in regards to FA, their current RB situation, and if they expect to be able to replace Murray in the draft with a rookie RB or FA. And please all you Murray fans out there, don't shoot the messenger. I am just trying to gain a grasp on why and how some of these things may fall into place with some of my thoughts, not any known fact. Here are some interesting comments from Peter King...
"Do you believe that Peterson will ever play for the Vikings again?
King: Well, I think there’s two questions to ask. Will the Vikings release Adrian Peterson? And I think the answer to that is no. Will he ever play for the Vikings again? I think the answer is doubtful. And I think what it means is that somebody out there is going to have to come up with a trade for Adrian Peterson, which is complicated…Let’s just take the Dallas Cowboys, for instance. In my opinion, at least as of now, I doubt sincerely they’ll put the franchise tag on DeMarco Murray, but they still want DeMarco Murray back. If they are stuck with DeMarco Murray and he’s demanding $12 million a year or some huge sum that they don’t want to pay, they could easily say, ‘We’ll let you go,’ make a trade for Adrian Peterson and sign Adrian Peterson to a new contract so they don’t owe him $13 million for this year so they can have a more manageable cap number on their franchise running back for 2015."
This team is certainly in a pickle concerning the status of their RBs right now with both Murray and Randle. Do you pay an injury prone RB just coming off a 400+ carry season "near AP type money", while also facing a serious risk of losing both your franchise RB (Murray to FA) and his back up (Randle to league suspension or being cut). Does this team honestly and seriously believe that they can continue with their game-plan and team identity of running the football down the other team's throat, if they somehow lose both by just using the draft and bargain basement prices?? Interesting to see what they really do have planned here. I just don't see any rookie stepping in and carrying this team right away the way that Murray did this season, and the only hope they have of maintaining their team identity imo, is to either pay Murray and cross your fingers that he doesn't get hurt again, or make a serious run at AP if becomes available. The clock is ticking...
"Do you believe that Peterson will ever play for the Vikings again?
King: Well, I think there’s two questions to ask. Will the Vikings release Adrian Peterson? And I think the answer to that is no. Will he ever play for the Vikings again? I think the answer is doubtful. And I think what it means is that somebody out there is going to have to come up with a trade for Adrian Peterson, which is complicated…Let’s just take the Dallas Cowboys, for instance. In my opinion, at least as of now, I doubt sincerely they’ll put the franchise tag on DeMarco Murray, but they still want DeMarco Murray back. If they are stuck with DeMarco Murray and he’s demanding $12 million a year or some huge sum that they don’t want to pay, they could easily say, ‘We’ll let you go,’ make a trade for Adrian Peterson and sign Adrian Peterson to a new contract so they don’t owe him $13 million for this year so they can have a more manageable cap number on their franchise running back for 2015."
This team is certainly in a pickle concerning the status of their RBs right now with both Murray and Randle. Do you pay an injury prone RB just coming off a 400+ carry season "near AP type money", while also facing a serious risk of losing both your franchise RB (Murray to FA) and his back up (Randle to league suspension or being cut). Does this team honestly and seriously believe that they can continue with their game-plan and team identity of running the football down the other team's throat, if they somehow lose both by just using the draft and bargain basement prices?? Interesting to see what they really do have planned here. I just don't see any rookie stepping in and carrying this team right away the way that Murray did this season, and the only hope they have of maintaining their team identity imo, is to either pay Murray and cross your fingers that he doesn't get hurt again, or make a serious run at AP if becomes available. The clock is ticking...