So how is this comparable to Hill and Hibbert? It's like comparing apples to oranges. Those guys are/were individual employees. Hill was a free agent when the Pacers let walk and I'm pretty sure he's quite happy with his $48 million.
It's not apples and oranges at all. All the Pacers had to do was pay Hill what he was worth and he remains a Pacer. Your FO made the decision to let an important player walk and they got nothing in return. In short, Hill is no longer a Pacer because the Pacers FO made a decision to let him walk instead of pay him. So again, where was the Pacers loyalty to him?
Hibbert, despite having been a huge reason that the Pacers were almost able to take down Lebron and the Heat, was traded away as soon as the Pacers decided that he was no longer able to provide what they needed. Again, where was the Pacers loyalty to him?
George, on the other hand, put an entire organization in a pickle when he announced, with one year on his contract no less, what his intentions were and without letting the season play itself out.
No he didn't. The Pacers put themselves in a pickle when they started trying to trade him, apparently let other teams know why they were looking to trade him and either had one of the other teams leak that info or leaked it themselves.
By informing the Pacers of his intentions prior to the season, George gave them the opportunity to work out a trade so that they could get something for him. Hill didn't do that. The fact that the Pacers chose to take literally the worst offer they received is on them and just further illustrates why George wanted out in the first place.
The individual is not above the organization. Couldn't be more blunt than that. I'm not above my organization, and I don't even make millions of dollars to dry any tears with.
Do you know why it's customary to give an employer 2 weeks notice before leaving? The reason is so that the employer has time to hire and at least begin to train that employees replacement.
George gave the Pacers a whole years worth of notice so that they could have ample time to target and try to get something in return for him. In short, he gave the NBA version of his 2 weeks notice.
He didn't demand a trade, he didn't refuse to play for the Pacers until they traded him and from everything we've seen and heard, he had every intention of playing out the season. He just let them know that he'd be leaving at the end of the season.
As for your loyalty to your company. While admirable to a degree, it's also shortsighted. How loyal do you think your company would be to you if they decided that they could make more money by eliminating your position?
I love the company I work for. I worked for them about 15 years ago, left because the couldn't pay me what I needed to make at the time. I always hoped that I would be able to return one day. I was blessed enough for it to happen and they even pay me considerably more than they did back then. I even have a 3 hour round trip commute that I make every day because I like this company so much.
But make no mistake, if I were to be offered a position with another company that I felt was significantly better for myself and my family, I would leave again.
Just like they would let me go if they decided it was in their best interest to eliminate my position.
Last edited: