SteelersPride
Well-Known Member
Im sorry but, terrell davis only had 4 years over 1k rushing yards, and one of them he topped 2k..........if he is a hall of famer, so is chris johnson........
Sorry but I just can't believe how misinformed you are with this post... Can't let it go
Here's more "average" stats according to you...
* Eight seasons with 1,000 Rush yds (T-5th in NFL history)
* 14 players in NFL history have rushed for at least 12,000 yards. Of the 12 that are eligible for the Hall of Fame, Bettis is the only one not already enshrined.
* Tied for 10th on the career rushing TD's leaders. (Ahead of Dickerson, Dorsett, Campbell...)
...But he didn't excel at his position???
Hmm... I guess you're saying those other guys below Bettis' stats shouldn't be in the HOF?
Sorry but I just can't believe how misinformed you are with this post... Can't let it go
Here's more "average" stats according to you...
* Eight seasons with 1,000 Rush yds (T-5th in NFL history)
* 14 players in NFL history have rushed for at least 12,000 yards. Of the 12 that are eligible for the Hall of Fame, Bettis is the only one not already enshrined.
* Tied for 10th on the career rushing TD's leaders. (Ahead of Dickerson, Dorsett, Campbell...)
...But he didn't excel at his position???
Hmm... I guess you're saying those other guys below Bettis' stats shouldn't be in the HOF?
I never ever thought of him as a
hof`er.
His claim to fame was how many rings he`d won over his career..............good thing he won them instead of the team.
I wonder where aikman and emmitt,Rice and Montana be without him.:rollseyes:
Bettis was a very good player but his numbers do not add up to HOF enshrinement, yet he is currently 3rd on this list in the modern voting.
Every other player listed excelled at their position more than Bettis did. He shouldn't be in this group.
I think Bettis and Davis is going to be a very interesting comparison. On one hand you have Bettis like was pointed out who over the course of his career compiled a lot of touchdowns and yards to put him with some of the biggest names in the history of the game. On the other hand looking at individual seasons he had a couple really good seasons but surrounded by a bunch of thousand yard seasons where he was closer to maybe the 10th best back in the NFL compared to top of the class.
On the other side of the coin you have Terrell Davis who for a 3-year period maybe had the best 3-year run of any RB in NFL history. He actually was the MVP of the league and unanimous best back in the NFL during that span. He also still holds the record for best rushing yards per playoff game showing that when the lights were brightest he was able to take it even to a whole new level. Unfortunately injuries sidelined a for sure HOF career to now putting him right on that edge.
I think Bettis and Davis is going to be a very interesting comparison. On one hand you have Bettis like was pointed out who over the course of his career compiled a lot of touchdowns and yards to put him with some of the biggest names in the history of the game. On the other hand looking at individual seasons he had a couple really good seasons but surrounded by a bunch of thousand yard seasons where he was closer to maybe the 10th best back in the NFL compared to top of the class.
On the other side of the coin you have Terrell Davis who for a 3-year period maybe had the best 3-year run of any RB in NFL history. He actually was the MVP of the league and unanimous best back in the NFL during that span. He also still holds the record for best rushing yards per playoff game showing that when the lights were brightest he was able to take it even to a whole new level. Unfortunately injuries sidelined a for sure HOF career to now putting him right on that edge.
Speaking of former Broncos how the hell is Steve Atwater not in the HOF yet? Loved watching him play back in the day.
as a cowboy fan.....I say the same about Chuck Howley.
Both Pittsburgh receivers from the 70's but no Drew Pearson?
oh well....wouldn't want that job
Yeah Davis was considered the unanimous best back in the NFL maybe 2 of that 3 year stretch. Definitely not in 97 and 96 is questionable, He was the best in 98 for sure. I think he'll get in, and deserves to, eventually.
Speaking of former Broncos how the hell is Steve Atwater not in the HOF yet? Loved watching him play back in the day.
I think Bettis and Davis is going to be a very interesting comparison. On one hand you have Bettis like was pointed out who over the course of his career compiled a lot of touchdowns and yards to put him with some of the biggest names in the history of the game. On the other hand looking at individual seasons he had a couple really good seasons but surrounded by a bunch of thousand yard seasons where he was closer to maybe the 10th best back in the NFL compared to top of the class.
On the other side of the coin you have Terrell Davis who for a 3-year period maybe had the best 3-year run of any RB in NFL history. He actually was the MVP of the league and unanimous best back in the NFL during that span. He also still holds the record for best rushing yards per playoff game showing that when the lights were brightest he was able to take it even to a whole new level. Unfortunately injuries sidelined a for sure HOF career to now putting him right on that edge.
*3.9 yards per carry for his career.
*Never led the league in rushing. Finished in the top 10 in rushing yards only four times in his career.
I never said that he didn't excel at his position. I said that he didn't excel in comparision to the others on the ballot.
I feel that Kurt Warner was a better QB than Bettis was a RB. Same with Seau as a LB, Shield as a G, Pace as an OT, Lynch as a S, Anderson as a K, Harrison and Brown at WR (3rd and 5th respectively), Greene at LB/DE (3rd all time in sacks), and Tinglehoff at C.
The case could be made that Greene, Haley, and Bettis are the weakest of the candidates listed. They were still great players in their own right but I can't emphatically say that they are better than the other guys listed.
If Bettis makes it in over the others, then in my mind it can be contributed heavily to his likeability, the position that he plays (more RBs make it in than any position other than QB, which is already an unfair bias), and his longevity in the league.
I guess that the longevity does need to be rewarded also, but he was certainly not as dynamic in the short term as Davis was, but Davis had his career cut short due to injury.
Historically speaking, guys with Bettis' overall career total yardage rushing numbers have gotten in, but it is debatable and depends on how you approach the selection. Do you award a player for being great over the short term more or less than you award a player for being great on a slightly lesser great over a longer period of time? It is a debate that I have been interested in since Kenny Easley, the Safety that many, including Ronnie Lott, say was the best they have ever seen play, was not selected due to his career being cut short.
In reviewing the numbers, I am willing to retract some of my statement, but I still agree with the overall concept behind it: Bettis is awarded for the position that he plays and his longevity in the league, but at no point was he ever the positively the best RB in the NFL for a given year.