Guys I need advice, quick!

[The Foot]

Keeper league trade:

Side A gets:

Russell Wilson
Decarcus Ware

Side B gets:

Tannehill
Charles Clay
Bryce Brown

Which side would you want?

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Probably side B...

Russel wilson is a great QB, but he is on a Running first team... Tannehill has more potential to get the big statistics...

Demarcus Ware- i have no clue about defensive stats in fantasy

clay- could be a legitimate Fantasy TE

Bryce Brown, if philly keeps with this offense, bryce brown will be a legitimate RB2 ...

 

[TKOSpikes]

What has Ware done lately? He is far from the sack leader he once was. I think Wilson is a top 5 QB next year... but I might take the other two players with the downgrade to Tanny as long as it doesn't hurt me with the other drop I assume I'd have to make.

Of course, I would decline if I was set at TE and wasn't in dire need of RB depth.

 

[averagejoe]

Keeper league trade:

Side A gets: Russell Wilson; Decarcus Ware
Side B gets: Tannehill; Charles Clay; Bryce Brown

Which side would you want?

It's weird, because A seems better, but B has some potential.

Demarcas Ware may be starting to wear. 9-yr veteran who missed some time this season. Tanny and Charles have upside, but a lot of players have upside. Depends if you're a glass-half-full kind of guy. Bryce Brown should get plenty of touches in that offense, but he's still only a "relief" RB.

So basically the trade involves a top-10 QB and a decent, but old, IDP for 3 marginal starters.

 

[The Foot]

Thanks guys, Joe what side would you pick?

 

[averagejoe]

Thanks guys, Joe what side would you pick?

If I was team B, I would stand pat. If I were team A, I would accept this trade immediately.

 

[The Foot]

So just to be perfectly clear Joe you would rather have Team B, correct?

 

[averagejoe]

No. I'm saying that if I had Tanny, Clay & Brown, I would accept the trade for Wilson & Ware immediately. (And Ware might be expendable.)

Like I said, "upside" is nice to stroke your ego, but if you have a proven, consistent starter, that has to take a backseat to "upside."

 

[MilkSpiller22]

No. I'm saying that if I had Tanny, Clay & Brown, I would accept the trade for Wilson & Ware immediately. (And Ware might be expendable.)

Like I said, "upside" is nice to stroke your ego, but if you have a proven, consistent starter, that has to take a backseat to "upside."

it really depends on the league scoring... Tannehill should get more yards and TDs, but also more interceptions and fumbles...

 

[Sam Sportboy]

Keeper league trade:

Side A gets:

Russell Wilson
Decarcus Ware

Side B gets:

Tannehill
Charles Clay
Bryce Brown

Which side would you want?

Not a really big fan of either side TBH but Wilson is the best player in that trade. If this is your 40 player dynasty team then I could see the temptation for side B but IMO for side B to get the advantage Brown would need to be the starter somewhere.

 

[TREFF]

IMHO, not only is Wilson the best player in the deal, he's the only one with any real serious value. All the rest are throw in bench fillers/spot starters. Ware isn't a great IDP start given his only asset is sacks, and he hasn't been getting many of those THill's realistic ceiling is a match up play/bye week fill in, and Bruce Brown's value will be entirely dependant on him finding a new team in 2014, as is he's a handcuff for Shady owners and virtually worthless to everyone else. As for Clay, is he a decent fantasy TE? Sure, but his potential isn't any better than a handful of other TE'S that flashed this year.

Just considering the players involved, I'd much rather be the team receiving Wilson.

However, if a guy has Shady, and a strong QB1 already, the deal would be nice for depth and insurance for the team getting Brown/Hill/Clay

 

[The Foot]

Thanks guys, I took Wilson and Ware and got him to throw in Vick for good measure!

 

[TREFF]

Well I'd be shocked if Vick adds any real value to your team, but well done getting another player when you were already winning the deal.

 

[The Foot]

Thanks Treff!

 

[wilwhite]

I agree. Harvin should lift Wilson to the next level next year. By the way, if Vick somehow ends up in Minnesota that could be pretty potent... but you just can't count on him playing a full season.

 

[Chef99]

I agree. Harvin should lift Wilson to the next level next year. By the way, if Vick somehow ends up in Minnesota that could be pretty potent... but you just can't count on him playing a full season.

Nah, we'd rather take Eli off of Coughlin's hands, thank you very much.

 

[TREFF]

Nah, we'd rather take Eli off of Coughlin's hands, thank you very much.

Wait..depending on the head coach, a potential read option play package with AP, all sorts of possibilities with Patterson, and you'd prefer Eli throwing to Lions, Packers and Bears?? Oh my!

 

[Chef99]

Wait..depending on the head coach, a potential read option play package with AP, all sorts of possibilities with Patterson, and you'd prefer Eli throwing to Lions, Packers and Bears?? Oh my!

Yep. It comes down to: is Eli capable of making a comeback, or is Vick capable of staying in one piece?

I will admit that my perspective may be slightly skewed due to the QB bullshit we have endured ever since Favre left...how GM Rick Speilman still has his job is beyond me.

Oh! Foot, I like the deal! I am a big Wilson fan.

 

[TKOSpikes]

I will admit that my perspective may be slightly skewed due to the QB bullshit we have endured ever since Favre left...how GM Rick Speilman still has his job is beyond me

...ahh Chef, poor Chef... you think you've had to endure QB struggles? lol -- my Favre was Bledsoe, and even that only lasted half a season (the good parts anyway), and that was 10 years ago!

 

[Sam Sportboy]

...ahh Chef, poor Chef... you think you've had to endure QB struggles? lol -- my Favre was Bledsoe, and even that only lasted half a season (the good parts anyway), and that was 10 years ago!

Lol...............if it wasn't for Warner the list of Rams QB's while I've been a fan has to be the worst list of QB's ever. Didn't you guys have some dude named Jim Kelly?