gp956
The Hammer
- 13,846
- 1
- 36
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
To be fair, he's also anti-black, anti-Latin, anti-military, anti-capitalism...he's an angry young man
Wait.......anti-capitalism? ......now that's going too far

To be fair, he's also anti-black, anti-Latin, anti-military, anti-capitalism...he's an angry young man
When you guys read articles about Buster Posey and they talk about how Scott Cousins received death threats, does Marcus pop into your head? lol
tzill, did you know Marcus converted to become a jew just so he could make jokes about them?
To be fair, he's also anti-black, anti-Latin, anti-military, anti-capitalism...he's an angry young man
can't seem to work in an anti-dentite reference here.....
can't seem to work in an anti-dentite reference here.....
....crossing the 7000 post barrier!
Proof you have no life...
7K posts in one year on one site...
I have been an active poster for about 4 years on ESPN, Runboard, here etc (lurked for about 4 or 5 years prior to that) and have a GRAND TOTAL of about 9K posts.
loser
How about this...
We need to make sure we do not become a fascist board where the BanHammer is wielded lightly.
Therefore, anyone who offers a ban on someone needs to do it openly so all know who wielded the hammer.
NN/HH was a clear issue. But what about Recon, for example? He is a solid poster who came over here to gloat. None of us wanted to ban, but what if someone is butthurt enough to do it? That, to me, is a potential problem.
Forcing the wielder of the hammer to go public is a good check to balance that power.
thoughts?
How about this...
We need to make sure we do not become a fascist board where the BanHammer is wielded lightly.
Therefore, anyone who offers a ban on someone needs to do it openly so all know who wielded the hammer.
NN/HH was a clear issue. But what about Recon, for example? He is a solid poster who came over here to gloat. None of us wanted to ban, but what if someone is butthurt enough to do it? That, to me, is a potential problem.
Forcing the wielder of the hammer to go public is a good check to balance that power.
thoughts?
No problem with that.....but it already is public info. If you go to the profile there's an infraction tab that lists the infractions received. So it's public, but it's not broadcast.