StanMarsh51
Well-Known Member
How many studs on defense of the bulls have?
Look at all the easy questions
Only dick riders use the term studs to describe athletes.
Were you a groupie for the '90s Bulls waiting outside their hotel?
How many studs on defense of the bulls have?
Look at all the easy questions
@Heatles84 Was a really good Waterboy on his high school basketball team.
Only dick riders use the term studs to describe athletes.
Were you a groupie for the '90s Bulls waiting outside their hotel?
96 Bulls had 4 studs on defense. 3 of them in the group of best of all time and a 4th pretty dam good too. Which means nothing apparently.
"That high percentage jumpshot would just be too much for the Bulls"
And so they talked about Golden State being the greatest before KD? But what happened did they validate their 73 win season? Have they won 3 in row twice? Easy questions
No they didn't validate it. But they did this year, doing something the Bulls never did. Only losing one game the entire playoffs.
And you continue to talk about Chicago having 3-4 of the greatest defensive players of all-time, but in their banner year, they ranked 3rd in the NBA in scoring defense. How is that possible?
Remember how big a deal it was when Jordan hit 6 three pointers in one half in 1992. The #3 option on offense for GSW hit 9 in one quarter. It is a different game now.
MJ was a transcendent talent who we most likely will never see in our lifetime, but GSW is a transcendent team and in basketball, it is a team game. GSW has much more talent and the mismatches would be ugly.
We can argue about this all day, but at the end of the day it's an opinion. I value defense a lot more than most people in this chat room. I know what it's like to play a great defender and get locked down and how hard it is to get clean shots off
HAS Golden State won three in a row or not?
And if three or four of the best defenders of all time in their prime finish #3 in the league what's that tell you?
Knicks were beasts on defense. Studs too
Are you saying that the Bulls D is overrated or that they were not good?
My only issue with your stance is that its hard to gauge how the Bulls would play defense in this era, especially against a team like Golden State, cause they never even came close to facing offenses like in todays game
Their biggest challengers were the Knicks who had Ewing and a bunch of solid role players, or Reggie Miller and an offensively challenged supporting cast.....
Im halfway to agreeing with you, just cant go all the way because of the offenses they faced overall
The '86 Celtics were pretty good too.Now that the Warriors are champs, the debate can begin in earnest.
They won 73 games last year, and added KD who is easily their best player now and either 2nd or 3rd best in the entire league. They went 16-1 in the playoffs, setting an all time record (Lakers were 15-1). They play together brilliantly and just completely dismantled a very good Cavalier team.
I grew up as a huge Jordan fan, watching almost every game he played throughout the 90s. I have never seen a team as good as these Warriors. They are truly awesome. I think there are a couple teams throughout history who might have been capable of pushing them to the limit, but none are better, IMO.
The 2017 GOlden State Warriors are the GOAT IMO.
I'm saying you are overestimating how good the Bulls defense was -- don't get me wrong, they were very good, but calling them the best defenders of all time is ridiculous. Out of the entire time Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen played together, they won exactly one Defensive Player of the Year award - it was in 1988 in Pippen's rookie (Jordan won it). Rodman won 2 but long before he came to Chicago and in 1996 he was 35 years old.
I have no idea who the 4th guy is you are talking about, but GSW would be a team unlike anything Chicago had ever seen. The NBA isn't a half court offense, taking it to the basket league, rinse and repeat anymore. The players are bigger and faster, you have 7 footers sprinting up and down the floor, not lumbering like Cartwright or Luc Longley (I think that was their center)
If guys took shots where GSW regularly takes 3's back in the 90'z -- 25, 26, 27 feet out -- they'd be sitting on the bench. The only reason I say Chicago would win 1or 2 is that Jordan would be impossible to guard. In the 90's, you could decapitate a guy going to the rim and they still couldn't stop him. Today, he'd average 15+ FT a game.
I'm saying you are overestimating how good the Bulls defense was -- don't get me wrong, they were very good, but calling them the best defenders of all time is ridiculous. Out of the entire time Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen played together, they won exactly one Defensive Player of the Year award - it was in 1988 in Pippen's rookie (Jordan won it). Rodman won 2 but long before he came to Chicago and in 1996 he was 35 years old.
I have no idea who the 4th guy is you are talking about, but GSW would be a team unlike anything Chicago had ever seen. The NBA isn't a half court offense, taking it to the basket league, rinse and repeat anymore. The players are bigger and faster, you have 7 footers sprinting up and down the floor, not lumbering like Cartwright or Luc Longley (I think that was their center)
If guys took shots where GSW regularly takes 3's back in the 90'z -- 25, 26, 27 feet out -- they'd be sitting on the bench. The only reason I say Chicago would win 1or 2 is that Jordan would be impossible to guard. In the 90's, you could decapitate a guy going to the rim and they still couldn't stop him. Today, he'd average 15+ FT a game.
The '86 Celtics were pretty good too.