kramer1
Sports betting savant
Not Gio?
Gio could be #7-8 at best.
Not Gio?
Aside from giving myself whiplash from shaking my head. . One Quick comment and I'm not even going to bother on this subject again.
you have no clue as to their emotional or psychological state, pretending you do is asinine, pure and simple. . Anyone could just as easily argue that he's finally gotten a decent payday, will be content and mail it in.. .
Just simply say you honestly have no rational reason, but it's your opinion and you're' sticking to it. That's all you can fall back on. . It's this other BS that you harp about that gets you going backwards every time
This type of analysis will be part of the NFL combine by 2016. I know a neuropsychologist who created a system and will be presenting it to NFL teams within the next couple months. Dude is literally going to be a billionaire.
But you are correct. I doubt that Foot has an accurate way to assess these traits right now. By 2016 though, look out!
This type of analysis will be part of the NFL combine by 2016. I know a neuropsychologist who created a system and will be presenting it to NFL teams within the next couple months. Dude is literally going to be a billionaire.
But you are correct. I doubt that Foot has an accurate way to assess these traits right now. By 2016 though, look out!
Oh good grief. Make it stop. It's football not basket weaving.
Thought that's what the wunderlik was supposed to do. . And everyone is split as to whether that means anything. Eh, maybe this guy is better? Wonder if they already measure and compare finger length, and at what point will penis size determine a team's starting QB? But hey at least a final word on the length vs girth debate will be known
It is also a multi-billion dollar industry and an athlete's ability to process information and make decisions is every bit as important as his physical gifts. An assessment like this could be the difference between your team drafting Peyton Manning and Ryan Leaf.
If someone can find a way to assess these traits, why not use the information?
[/B]
I would agree there.
How would that system have evaluated Vontaze Burfict?
Make it stop.
You wan't killers. I can see MAYBE it being important for QB's, but no other position. Half these idiots can't spell their own name.
You are way off.
Besides, intelligence and ability to process information are two very different things.
I would agree too, but personally I'm skeptical that developing a system to gather that information is a billion dollar endeavour.
At big AAU basketball tournaments, the coaches packet that is nothing but a collection of team rosters + contact information sells to college coaches for like $300.
If this system works, how many million a year do you think teams will pay for their analysis of all draft eligible prospects? I have coached enough to know that the difference between potential and production is often found in the gray matter.
That does not even consider revenue from college teams, and other sports (NBA, MLB, etc.)
No, I'm not. I talk to retired coaches every single day. People who coached with Kerry Coombs now at Ohio State. People who played at UC. People who played at OSU. I know them. My IQ is 150. No bullshittin'. You're wrong. I think it's a reasonable assessment for QB's without even knowing what it is. That part intrigues me. It doesn't matter for oafs, though. And that's what 90% of them are. Big, dumb, idiots.
Based on your proclamations of inside Bengal knowledge, pardon me while I take your statements with a grain of salt.
You are a hater, and that 2nd comment is off win offensive. There are some athletes who are not so bright, but to say that 90% are idiots is an extremely ignorant comment.