You still need to have a good D.
Hes normally comfortable against pressure because he can usually get it out to a receiver. I credit Denvers secondary much more than their pass rush
You can discuss what ever you want, but it's usual for you to run your shit when the Packers lose and disappear when they're doing well. So what does that say about you?
I barely post here. Look at my post count. Especially this year as I just got a new job and have been busy. You have me confused for someone else. I posted a lot during the NCAA tournament.
It's not about the film, it's about Rodgers' desire to never let this happen again, he's already doubted enough as it is. His determination will be on another level from this point forward.
huh? Who doubts his talent these days?
Well until he gets that second Super Bowl there will always be people.
The QB can only do so much. Rodgers will almost always keep the Packers close no matter who they play (tonight was an exception). But he can't overcome the complete teams by himself. I don't think the Packers are that good on D when they go up against good QBs. Just look what Rivers did to them. They always feast against average to bad QBs but you rarely face those in the playoffs and against winning teams. And when they get behind in games, they are easy to run the ball on.
I don't. You usually post here after Green Bay loses...and that usually doesn't coincide with the Sunday the Packers play the Bears... basically, your favorite team is whoever plays and beats the Packers...so it can't really be the Bears...now can it???
Arizona is too inconsistent. Right now I'd take Carolina over Green Bay or Arizona. I could also see St. Louis following the Seattle model to success: great d, great running game, although Foles isn't as good as Wilson. Plus the Rams are only a game back of Arizona in the loss column, and they already won in Arizona.
