juliansteed
Well-Known Member
I saw a pretty good explanation from someone about this in a discussion elsewhere. The Iron Islands didn't declare independence because they likely can't survive independently. The wars over the course of the show basically wrecked the Iron Fleet and of course Euron fucked a lot of shit up too. Basically, its more financially viable for them to stay in the Kingdom and get the benefits and resources than it is to try to make a go of it alone.
As for Dorne? Eh. Who really cares. It's Dorne. The show never did anything with them and all we even know is they have a nameless Prince as leader. Would we really want time spent talking about Dornish independence from people we never really spent much time with at all? If there had to be a reason I guess you could maybe claim that since the Lannisters basically died out (with the exception of Tyrion) as well as there being no more Targs, Dorne no longer had such a big beef anymore so they were willing to give this new order a shot.
I'm still not clear on what the benefits to the North being independent are, aside from Sansa getting to call herself queen. It made sense to want independence when The Lannisters controlled the Crown and when it was looking like Daenerys would, but now that one of their own is king?
Also Sansa talks about how they fought for their independence, but who did they fight and defeat to become independent? They were fighting for independence (among other things) in The War of the 5 Kings, but they lost. Then they fought a civil war against the Boltons but that was to retake control of the North from another Northern house. Then they fought and defeated the White Walkers which of course had nothing to do with Northern independence.