Free Agency Review - GRADES

[BINGO]

2012 NFC free-agency grades
Grading every NFC team on how much it has improved in free agency
Originally Published: March 30, 2012
By Matt Williamson | Scouts Inc.


The NFL landscape has shifted since the New York Giants beat the New England Patriots in Super Bowl XLVI on Feb. 5. Peyton Manning has a new team, Mario Williams has a new home and the Washington Redskins made a blockbuster trade for the rights to the No. 2 pick.

Matt Williamson grades all 32 NFL teams on their free-agent acquisitions and trades, beginning with the AFC. This is the file for the entire NFC.




San Francisco 49ers

Key additions: S Dashon Goldson (franchised), QB Alex Smith (re-sign), CB Carlos Rogers (re-sign), WR Mario Manningham, LB Ahmad Brooks (re-sign), WR Randy Moss, RB Brandon Jacobs, QB Josh Johnson, CB Perrish Cox, WR Ted Ginn (re-sign), LB Tavares Gooden (re-sign)
Key losses: CB Shawntae Spencer, WR Josh Morgan, C Adam Snyder

Analysis: The 49ers are returning the league's best defense intact, even though they had a few prominent players' contracts expire. While they flirted with Peyton Manning (and to me, this is where Manning should have chosen to play), they have significantly improved their offense since the NFC Championship Game. What is curious is that while San Francisco clearly made a massive effort to improve the verticality of its offense with the additions of Moss and Manningham and even the re-signing of Ginn, Smith really isn't an adept downfield passer. Still, the new perimeter speed should open up room for the rest of San Francisco's offense while allowing Jim Harbaugh to utilize more multiple-receiver sets, which obviously is the direction offense in the NFL has gone. It also wouldn't shock me if Colin Kaepernick -- and his huge arm -- finds his way behind center before long.

Grade: A




St. Louis Rams

Key additions: CB Cortland Finnegan, DE Kendall Langford, C Scott Wells, WR Steve Smith
Key losses: WR Brandon Lloyd, CB Ron Bartell, DE James Hall, DT Justin Bannan, DT Fred Robbins, C Jason Brown

Analysis: Recently, I tagged the Rams as big offseason winners this year, and my reasoning is best explained there. But to sum it up, the Rams are now set up extremely well to build their team for the long term with Jeff Fisher leading the show. Speaking of Fisher, his familiarity with Finnegan was obviously a huge factor. Not only does Finnegan fill a massive need on the field, but he's a good citizen off the field. Langford has some versatility in terms of where he can line up on the D-line and is just entering the prime of his career, while Wells is a big upgrade at center for St. Louis. Considering the dismal state of the Rams' wide receivers, taking a chance on Smith is a calculated gamble that could pay off as a security blanket for Sam Bradford. The Rams also did a nice job of purging some older expensive defensive linemen to better prepare for the future. We might not see the results of this offseason during the 2012 season, but St. Louis is set up extremely well for the long term because of what it has done during this period.

Grade: A



Seattle Seahawks

Key additions: QB Matt Flynn, DT Red Bryant (re-sign), RB Marshawn Lynch (re-sign), DT Jason Jones, T Frank Omiyale, RB Michael Robinson (re-sign)
Key losses: TE John Carlson, G Robert Gallery, CB Marcus Trufant, QB Charlie Whitehurst, DT Anthony Hargrove

Analysis: This is an up-and-coming football team. While I am not the biggest Flynn believer, he is a clear improvement at the most important position on the field -- so I can't argue with that acquisition, especially at the price. Seattle is betting on Flynn, but they aren't betting the farm. Keeping Lynch in the fold should ensure that Flynn's transition to his new team is smoother. Bringing back Bryant, the massive run-stuffer, was huge for this young defense, as was adding an exceptional complement to Bryant in Jones, who is one of the better pure interior pass-rushers in the NFL. There are some big names on Seattle's key-losses list, but in reality, this group's value doesn't compare to its name recognition. The Seahawks are on the rise.

Grade: A




Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Key additions: G Carl Nicks, WR Vincent Jackson, CB Eric Wright, DE Michael Bennett (re-sign), G Jeremy Zuttah (re-sign), QB Dan Orlovsky, CB Ronde Barber (re-sign), T Jamon Meredith, K Connor Barth (franchised)
Key losses: QB Josh Johnson, C Jeff Faine

Analysis: The Bucs were huge early spenders in free agency. Jackson and Nicks are two of the better players at their respective positions and fill massive need positions for Tampa Bay. Wright was a questionable signing for the dollars it cost, but cornerback certainly was a major weakness on this roster. I would have liked to see Tampa Bay add a veteran or two with outstanding leadership skills to help lead this very young and sometimes troubled roster. However, the Bucs' key losses were minimal, and Tampa Bay is set up quite well to take the best player available with the No. 5 overall pick in the draft.

Grade: A-




Philadelphia Eagles

Key additions: DE Trent Cole (re-sign), WR DeSean Jackson (re-sign), LB DeMeco Ryans, G Evan Mathis (re-sign), T Todd Herremans (re-sign), DT Antonio Dixon (re-sign)
Key losses: DE Juqua Parker, C Jamaal Jackson, T Winston Justice, WR Steve Smith

Analysis: Unlike a year ago, the Eagles didn't go crazy this offseason. The trade for Ryans does appear to be a win-win for both teams, as Ryans is now another year removed from his Achilles injury, fits the Eagles' 4-3 better than Houston's odd front and has a better chance of being an every-down player in Philadelphia than he did in Houston. Middle linebacker was a huge need for Philadelphia, and banking on Luke Kuechly to be there for the Eagles' first-round pick at No. 15 was a big risk. Extensions such as the one Cole received often aren't factored in with handing out offseason grades, but keeping him around for the long term is instrumental to Philadelphia's success. Dixon also is a much better interior defensive player than many realize. Another long-term deal that should pay off for the Eagles is keeping DeSean Jackson, a true game changer. The Eagles had one of the best left sides of an offensive line in the NFL last season and kept that intact by re-signing Mathis. Locking up Herremans also helps the Eagles' front five. Overall, the Eagles did a great job of keeping their own players and weren't hit very hard with defections, although there has been a lot of recent talk that Asante Samuel could be traded. Philadelphia's continuity could go a long way toward its success and is in stark contrast with last offseason's spending spree.

Grade: B+




New Orleans Saints

Key additions: QB Drew Brees (franchised), DT Brodrick Bunkley, WR Marques Colston (re-sign), LB Curtis Lofton, G Ben Grubbs
Key losses: G Carl Nicks, CB Tracy Porter, WR Robert Meachem

Analysis: What an offseason for the Saints. Despite the scandal and controversy, New Orleans was able to add and retain quality players for its roster. However, it lost a ton of talent as well. The loss of Nicks is significant, as he very well could be the best guard in football, although Grubbs is a strong consolation prize. He was often th ebest O-lineman on the field for the Ravens last season. The Saints and Colston probably realized that Colston being in New Orleans was the best move for both player and team. The Saints made an excellent signing by adding Bunkley, one of the better run-stopping 4-3 defensive tackles in the NFL. Along those lines, adding Lofton could pay serious dividends, particularly in run defense. It has been a roller coaster offseason in New Orleans ... and the Saints still need to get Brees locked up with a long-term contract. Not to mention that Bill Parcells could be coming to town.

Grade: B




Washington Redskins

Key additions: WR Pierre Garcon, TE Fred Davis (re-sign), WR Josh Morgan, DE Adam Carriker (re-sign), S Brandon Meriweather, CB Cedric Griffin, QB Rex Grossman (re-sign)
Key losses: S LaRon Landry, S OJ Atogwe

Analysis: To me, the Redskins' moving up to put themselves in the position to draft Robert Griffin III was the best move of the offseason. Yes, even ahead of Denver's signing of Peyton Manning. What absolutely cannot be overlooked here, though, is the NFL's penalty against Washington for salary-cap violations. This penalty was handed down after the Redskins made their trade to move up for Griffin, so they thought they would have a fortune to spend in free agency to equip the rookie signal-caller with a much-improved supporting cast. Washington still was able to lock up Davis and land Garcon, although the price it paid for Garcon was suspect. You also could do much worse than Grossman as a backup quarterback. Meriweather and Griffin offer more name recognition than production or value, so overcoming the loss of two starting-caliber safeties could be difficult for Washington.

Grade: B

 

[BINGO]

Chicago Bears

Key additions: RB Matt Forte (franchised), WR Brandon Marshall, RB Michael Bush, DE Israel Idonije (re-sign), CB Tim Jennings (re-sign), TE Kellen Davis (re-sign), WR Eric Weems, QB Jason Campbell
Key losses: S Brandon Meriweather, T Frank Omiyale, QB Caleb Hanie

Analysis: Forte isn't going anywhere, and we all pretty much knew that would be the case. The Bears added a big fish who filled a massive need by trading for Marshall -- and it didn't cost them a lot to get the deal done. If Marshall behaves off the field, that was a great move by Chicago. After seeing what happened to their offense last season when Jay Cutler and Forte went down, the Bears were very proactive in free agency to acquire high-end backups in Campbell and Bush. Idonije is a solid two-way defensive end, but it wouldn't be surprising to see Chicago look for a dynamic pass-rush specialist early in the draft to complement Idonije. Offensive line also will be a major priority in the draft. In terms of losses, Chicago wasn't hit very hard. This looks like an improved team for 2012, but it's also an older one in some key spots on defense.

Grade: B




Dallas Cowboys

Key additions: CB Brandon Carr, LB Anthony Spencer (franchised), LB Dan Connor, G Nate Livings, QB Kyle Orton, G Mackenzy Bernadeau, S Brodney Pool, FB Lawrence Vickers
Key losses: WR Laurent Robinson, TE Martellus Bennett, G Kyle Kosier, CB Terence Newman

Analysis: Dallas addressed its needs in free agency and now is set up extremely well to take value players in the draft, instead of reaching for a need position. Carr should team with Mike Jenkins to make a formidable pair of cornerbacks while Pool is an upgrade at safety. Connor was an interesting and wise signing. A two-down run-stopper, he brings toughness and will be a complementary player to Bruce Carter. The offensive guards Dallas signed are probably better suited for backup duty than starting, but they will create plenty of competition for starting spots. And Dallas could target that position in the draft pretty easily. You have to think Dallas' grade would be even higher if the Cowboys hadn't been hit with a penalty for violating the salary cap.

Grade: B




Detroit Lions

Key additions: WR Calvin Johnson (re-sign), DE Cliff Avril (franchised), LB Stephen Tulloch (re-sign), T Jeff Backus (re-sign), QB Shaun Hill (re-sign), RB Kevin Smith (re-sign), CB Jacob Lacey
Key losses: CB Eric Wright, QB Drew Stanton

Analysis: The Lions were cash-strapped when free agency began but were able to keep Backus and Tulloch after freeing room with a long-term contract for Johnson. The Lions wisely didn't allow Avril, a valuable member of their defense who plays a premium position and is in his prime years, to test the open market. Backus also plays a premium position, and Tulloch is one of the top middle linebackers in the league. Bringing back Smith was excellent insurance at running back, especially considering the health concerns of Mikel Leshoure and Jahvid Best. The secondary and offensive line still could use work, but overall, the Lions weren't hit too hard in free agency, which is important for a young team on the rise like Detroit.

Grade: B




Atlanta Falcons

Key additions: CB Brent Grimes (franchised), DE John Abraham (re-sign), C Todd McClure (re-sign), DE Kroy Biermann (re-sign), S Thomas DeCoud (re-sign), WR Harry Douglas (re-sign), LB Lofa Tatupu, RB Jason Snelling (re-sign), G Vince Manuwai, QB Chris Redman (re-sign)
Key losses: LB Curtis Lofton, WR Eric Weems

Analysis: It can be easy to overlook re-signing your own players, but the Falcons did a very nice job in this regard by franchising Grimes and locking up both Abraham and Biermann. However, it's also difficult to say the Falcons are any better right now than they were when the season ended. The defense still has holes. The offensive line needs to add a starter or two. And Atlanta might need to find an eventual replacement for Abraham, Tony Gonzalez and Michael Turner -- without a first-round pick at its disposal. Losing Lofton in the middle will hurt.

Grade: C+




Green Bay Packers

Key additions: TE Jermichael Finley (re-sign), C Jeff Saturday, CB Jarrett Bush (re-sign), DT Anthony Hargrove
Key losses: QB Matt Flynn, C Scott Wells

Analysis: Not a ton to report here, but there were some big names involved. It's easy to overlook the Packers' locking up Finley, because it happened before free agency opened, but that was a key move to ensure that Green Bay remains loaded with receiving weapons for Aaron Rodgers. The Packers swapped out Wells for Saturday at center, which for the short term is pretty much a wash. Saturday might not have a lot left in the tank, but he was one of the very few bright spots in Indianapolis last season. Losing Flynn was a forgone conclusion, and while it would have been great to get something for him in return, the Packers could benefit next year at this time with compensatory draft picks, as they did this year.

Grade: C




New York Giants

Key additions: CB Terrell Thomas (re-sign), TE Martellus Bennett, TE Jake Ballard (re-sign), P Steve Weatherford (re-sign), QB David Carr (re-sign)
Key losses: WR Mario Manningham, CB Aaron Ross, RB Brandon Jacobs

Analysis: Unlike many Super Bowl champions, the Giants' roster wasn't heavily raided in free agency. And while New York didn't add a lot, I can't say it took a noticeable step backward. Bennett has been tough to count on since joining the NFL, but his receiving production should increase dramatically in New York, where he will be higher on the totem pole. Bennett is already an excellent blocker, which will aid the Giants' suspect offensive tackles. Thomas should compete with Prince Amukamara for a starting cornerback spot, with the loser acting as a high-end nickel back. And don't overlook the importance of Weatherford staying in New York. He is one of the best punters in the business.

Grade: C




Minnesota Vikings

Key additions: LB Erin Henderson (re-sign), G Geoff Schwartz, TE John Carlson, DT Letroy Guion (re-sign), QB Sage Rosenfels (re-sign)
Key losses: G Steve Hutchinson, G Anthony Herrera, CB Cedric Griffin, TE Jim Kleinsasser

Analysis: One good thing I can say about the Vikings is that assuming they pull the trigger on Matt Kalil with the third overall pick, which they absolutely should, Minnesota's offensive line is now set -- and could be quite good with the starters left to right as Kalil, Charles Johnson, John Sullivan, Schwartz and Phil Loadholt. But while Carlson will allow Minnesota to predominantly run double-tight end sets -- and he is rather Christian Ponder-friendly -- the Vikings simply invested too much in Carlson considering his recent lack of production and durability issues. Re-signing Henderson was an excellent move, as he is improving rapidly and is a young guy the Vikings can build around. Minnesota wasn't decimated too much in free agency, but that also is because the roster wasn't all that attractive to begin with.

Grade: D+




Carolina Panthers

Key additions: RB Mike Tolbert, Geoff Hangartner (re-sign)
Key losses: G Geoff Schwartz, LB Dan Connor, G Travelle Wharton, G Mackenzy Bernadeau

Analysis: The Panthers spent everything they had last year during free agency, so they weren't buyers this time around. They did make a curious signing with Tolbert, though. Of course, this coaching staff is very familiar with Tolbert and any team would love to add an overall contributor like him, but it could be argued that running back was the last position Carolina needed to spend more money on. Will another shoe drop on this in the form of a trade of Jonathan Stewart or DeAngelo Williams? The Panthers also could stand to add some offensive line reinforcements after losing three in free agency.

Grade: D




Arizona Cardinals

Key additions: DE Calais Campbell (franchised), CB William Gay, WR Early Doucet (re-sign), T Levi Brown (re-sign), C Adam Snyder
Key losses: CB Richard Marshall, G Rex Hadnot

Analysis: The Cardinals lost very little in free agency -- unless you count Peyton Manning among those losses. They also didn't add a lot and were strapped with financial issues, which really curtailed their ability to spend in free agency. Campbell needed to be franchised and is now a cornerstone player in this organization. Gay and Doucet will have starter/depth value, but the Cardinals' offensive line still looks like one of the worst in all of football. It would be surprising if Arizona wasn't proactive in drafting offensive linemen this draft.

Grade: D

 

[clyde_carbon]

It also wouldn't shock me if Colin Kaepernick -- and his huge arm -- finds his way behind center before long.

Me neither.

 

[BINGO]

2012 AFC free-agency grades
Grading every AFC team on how much it has improved in free agency
Updated: April 1, 2012, 11:56 AM ET
By Matt Williamson | Scouts Inc.

With Peyton Manning on the Denver Broncos, the landscape of the AFC has shifted.

The landscape of the NFL has shifted since the New York Giants beat the New England Patriots in Super Bowl XLVI on February 5th. Peyton Manning has a new team, Mario Williams has a new home and the Washington Redskins made a blockbuster trade for the rights to the No. 2 pick.

Matt Williamson grades all 32 NFL teams on their free-agent acquisitions and trades, beginning with the AFC. The NFC will come Friday.



Kansas City Chiefs

Key additions: WR Dwayne Bowe (franchised), T Eric Winston, RB Peyton Hillis, CB Stanford Routt, TE Kevin Boss, LB Jovan Belcher (re-signed)
Key losses: CB Brandon Carr, QB Kyle Orton

Analysis: The Chiefs have had a great offseason, and it started before free agency opened when they signed Routt and franchised Bowe. Kansas City's right tackle position was one of the worst starting spots in the entire league last year. With Winston, the Chiefs have one of the five best right tackles in the game today. Signing Hillis for running back depth is also an excellent calculated risk. He can carry the load, or better yet, complement Jamaal Charles, as Kansas City's mercurial running back is returns from an ACL injury. The Chiefs' roster isn't perfect, and I still have huge concerns at the quarterback position, but they are in the enviable position of allowing the draft to come to them, selecting the best player on the board without reaching. And, they add some superb young talent that was already on their roster that was lost to injury in 2010 in Charles, Tony Moeaki and Eric Berry.

Grade: A




Buffalo Bills

Key additions: DE Mario Williams, WR Steve Johnson (re-signed), DE Mark Anderson, TE Scott Chandler (re-signed)
Key losses: None

Analysis: The Bills now have one of the best defensive lines in the league, as they transition to a 4-3. Adding Williams not only gives Buffalo a great player on game day, but also recognition as a team trying to improve that now has the ability to lure big-time free agents. The Bills took filling their biggest need one step further though by adding Anderson, a fine pass-rusher in his own right who might excel exploiting single blocking opposite Williams. Buffalo also kept Johnson, its top offensive playmaker. The Bills would have been in dire straits at wide receiver if Johnson left and if they couldn't find a suitable replacement. Buffalo's roster wasn't raided at all this offseason and that continuity could pay off heading into 2012. Unlike most years at this time, the Bills are not riddled with gaping holes that need to be addressed in the draft. Instead, they can take the best player available, which is a winning formula.

Grade: A





Denver Broncos

Key additions: QB Peyton Manning, CB Tracy Porter, TE Joel Dreessen, TE Jacob Tamme, LB Joe Mays (re-signed), K Matt Prater (franchised), QB Caleb Hanie, WR Andre Caldwell, S Mike Adams
Key losses: DT Brodrick Bunkley, QB Tim Tebow, WR Eddie Royal

Analysis: While I have said many times that I don't think Denver was the best landing spot for Manning, we must commend the Broncos for adding him to their roster. His presence makes them a better football team. However, Denver's offense from a year ago with Tebow behind center couldn't be any different than what Manning will be running from his Colts' days -- and that great Indianapolis offense was built over time on timing and repetitions. It wasn't built overnight. Snagging both Dreessen and Tamme was terrific work, as the Broncos will utilize a ton of double tight end offensive personnel groupings. Replacing Bunkley will be difficult, and I worry that Denver's run defense could be a big problem this season, but Mays is a very good interior run-stuffer at middle linebacker. Adding Porter is a nice upgrade opposite Champ Bailey, especially considering their pass-rush. And although the Broncos are extremely well-equipped with edge pass-rushers, their safeties need to improve. Up the middle of this defense is what worries me. Adams is a respectable stopgap at safety though, and Denver will have defensive tackle options in the first round of the draft. Plus, Ty Warren does return from injury.

Grade: A





New England Patriots

Key additions: WR Wes Welker (franchised), WR Brandon Lloyd, DE Jonathan Fanene, WR Deion Branch (re-signed), G Dan Connolly (re-signed), G Robert Gallery, DE Trevor Scott, WR Anthony Gonzalez, S Steve Gregory
Key losses: DE Mark Anderson, RB BenJarvus Green-Ellis

Analysis: No one thought that Welker was going anywhere -- and he isn't. Lloyd would be a welcome addition to any passing attack. He has been exceptional for two years in a row now and obviously has a great working relationship with Josh McDaniels. Adding Lloyd should make one of the NFL's best passing attacks noticeably better -- a frightening thought. Fanene should fit in very well with the Patriots' defensive line rotation with his versatility and all-around skill set. Overall though, New England took many low-risk/high-reward gambles. And if they hit on just one or two of them, the Super Bowl runners-up might be improved from top to bottom. Of course the Patriots also have an abundance of draft picks in 2012, but who is to say if they actually make the selections in this upcoming draft or stockpile future picks.

Grade: B




New York Jets

Key additions: DT Sione Pouha (re-signed), S LaRon Landry, QB Tim Tebow, LB Bryan Thomas (re-signed)
Key losses: S Brodney Pool

Analysis: Of course we have to talk about Tebow, but honestly I don't see it as an earth-shattering football addition. He just isn't a very good passer, giving the Jets two subpar passers (and I'm not talking about Greg McElroy). But Tebow will, at a minimum, contribute to the offense much like Brad Smith used to as a Wildcat-type runner -- and new offensive coordinator Tony Sparano obviously has a history of using that scheme from his days in Miami. Re-signing Pouha was an excellent move because he was a player that New York just couldn't afford to lose. Landry could be a huge acquisition for New York, as he has the rare combination of size and athletic ability to compete with New England's tight ends, and will be a huge help as a blitzer and run defender. Rex Ryan might get more out of Landry than anyone else could. But Landry needs to say healthy, and as coverage player he needs to show much better discipline and fundamentals. The Jets really haven't lost much of note.

Grade: B-





Cincinnati Bengals

Key additions: S Reggie Nelson (re-signed), RB BenJarvus Green-Ellis, DT Pat Sims (re-signed), T Anthony Collins (re-signed), CB Adam Jones (re-signed), K Mike Nugent (franchised), CB Jason Allen, G Travelle Wharton, LB Manny Lawson
Key losses: DE Frostee Rucker, DE Jonathan Fanene, G Nate Livings, WR Andre Caldwell

Analysis: The Bengals opened free agency with a ton of money to spend. With a surplus of early draft picks and this cap room at their disposal, Cincinnati was in a great position to really improve its roster. While I am a proponent of not overspending on other teams' castoffs, and bearing in mind that the Bengals have a great opportunity to add quality talent in the draft with two first-round picks, I can't help but feel that the Bengals let a golden opportunity slip through their hands this offseason. I would have attacked a high-end free agent or two such as Carl Nicks or Cortland Finnegan. The Bengals did well to keep their secondary intact by retaining Nelson and Jones, and overall, they are a pretty deep team. Upgrades should be in store from the draft, where they won't have to reach for a particular position.

Grade: B-




Jacksonville Jaguars

Key additions: DE Jeremy Mincey (re-signed), WR Laurent Robinson, CB Rashean Mathis (re-signed), S Dwight Lowery (re-signed), K Josh Scobee (franchised), LB Russell Allen (re-signed), QB Chad Henne, CB Aaron Ross
Key losses:

Analysis: The Jaguars were also a team that had a ton of money to spend when free agency opened. I commend them for bringing back key members of their already impressive defense. In fact, I think they are one quality defensive end opposite Mincey from being among the top defenses in the league. But Jacksonville's passing game remains a nightmare. And while I like the addition of Henne, adding Robinson just isn't good enough in the role of a team's top wide receiver. Robinson excels as a complementary piece, as he did in Dallas, but he just isn't built to handle the rigors being a No. 1 wideout. Durability could be Robinson's greatest weakness. Don't be surprised if Henne is starting opening day -- I think he is the best quarterback on Jacksonville's roster right now. While it's nice for the Jaguars that they didn't have any key losses, it's also somewhat telling that their free agents were not all that sought after on the open market.

Grade: C+

 

[BINGO]

Pittsburgh Steelers

Key additions: None
Key losses: LB James Farrior, DE Aaron Smith, G Chris Kemoeatu, WR Hines Ward, CB William Gay


Analysis: Not much to report here. Pittsburgh was greatly handcuffed by its salary cap situation. But even though the Steelers released quite a few older brand name players, they sit in good shape for the 2012 season. Mike Wallace was Pittsburgh's top player to retain and appears at this point that he will be playing for the Steelers next year -- and maybe longer. As the free agency process moves along, the Steelers will probably find a bargain or two, but this year, they were forced to be bystanders.

Grade: C





Indianapolis Colts

Key additions: WR Reggie Wayne (re-signed), DE Robert Mathis (re-signed), DT Cory Redding, T Winston Justice, C Samson Satele, QB Drew Stanton, S Tom Zbikowski, WR Donnie Avery
Key losses: QB Peyton Manning, WR Pierre Garcon, C Jeff Saturday, TE Dallas Clark, TE Jacob Tamme, G Ryan Diem, CB Jacob Lacey, RB Joseph Addai, Gary Brackett, S Melvin Bullitt, WR Anthony Gonzalez, QB Dan Orlovsky

Analysis: Obviously times have changed dramatically for the Colts and this will be Andrew Luck's team now. I do laud Indianapolis for retaining Wayne and Mathis. Both of them are still playing at a high level and obviously they have contributed to an awful lot of Colts' victories. Having some memory of the glory days could be a good thing in the locker room. Much like when Rex Ryan left Baltimore for the Jets' head coaching job, Chuck Pagano brought a few Ravens' defenders with him to his new gig to help install Baltimore's scheme and defensive mentality. I can't be extremely critical of Indianapolis' drastic approach to this offseason, but I also can't get past the fact that I expect them to have the worst roster in the NFL for the 2012 season. What is important now is how well the Colts handle their next few drafts.

Grade: C




Tennessee Titans

Key additions: LB Kamerion Wimbley, S Michael Griffin (franchised), G Steve Hutchinson, S Jordan Babineaux (re-signed)
Key losses: CB Cortland Finnegan, DT Jason Jones

Analysis: The Titans certainly needed an upgrade on the interior of their offensive line and while Hutchinson isn't the world-beater that he once was, he is an improvement at the left guard slot. They also needed a huge upgrade with their pass-rush. Wimbley is better suited to playing outside linebacker in a 3-4 than the defensive end spot he will occupy in Tennessee's 4-3, but he can get after the quarterback. Tennessee needs to be careful not to overwork him. The cost of putting the franchise tag on a safety wasn't very high, but Griffin isn't among the best players at his position. Losing Finnegan and Jones does hurt the pass defense, so expect the Titans to further fortify their pass D early in the draft.

Grade: C




Baltimore Ravens

Key additions: RB Ray Rice (franchised), C Matt Birk (re-signed), LB Jameel McClain (re-signed)
Key losses: G Ben Grubbs, LB Jarret Johnson, DT Cory Redding, S Tom Zbikowski, WR Lee Evans


Analysis: Rice is one of the most important players to his respective offense in the NFL. There was no way that Baltimore would allow him to hit the open market. Getting Birk back also should have short-term dividends. The Ravens lost several starters to other clubs over the past few weeks and will need younger players to step up in their place, but this remains a very strong roster.

Grade: C




San Diego Chargers

Key additions: WR Robert Meachem, T Jared Gaither (re-signed), C Nick Hardwick (re-signed), LB Jarret Johnson, WR Eddie Royal, QB Charlie Whitehurst
Key losses: WR Vincent Jackson, T Marcus McNeill, RB Mike Tolbert, DE Luis Castillo, QB Billy Volek, S Steve Gregory




Analysis: San Diego couldn't afford for Gaither to get away. Although he is about as risky of a signing as there is in free agency, his upside is immense -- and for the most part, when Gaither is on the field, he plays at a high level at an extremely important position. Losing Jackson is a blow, but Meachem isn't extremely far behind Jackson in terms of pure ability and Meachem's home run ability should make the transition smoother. Johnson isn't the dynamic complement to Shaun Phillips that many Chargers' fans longed for, but he is a versatile, tough run-stuffer who should handle the early down duties with Antwan Barnes being saved to get after quarterbacks in more clear throwing situations.

Grade: C




Houston Texans

Key additions: RB Arian Foster (re-signed), C Chris Myers (re-signed)
Key losses: DE Mario Williams, T Eric Winston, TE Joel Dreessen, LB DeMeco Ryans, CB Jason Allen, G Mike Brisiel, QB Matt Leinart, FB Lawrence Vickers

Analysis: For the first time in franchise history, the Texans had to deal with being the hunted rather than a lower tier team hunting from the rosters of the top teams in the NFL. With the exception of retaining Myers and locking up Foster, I can't say that Houston did a real good job in that role. The release of Winston remains as great of a mystery as any move this offseason, while losing Williams was much less of a shock. The Texans didn't think Ryans, now a two-down player for them, was worth what they were paying him. This was a rough offseason for the Texans and they really could use a strong draft. While they still should be considered the favorite in the AFC South, they've gone backwards so far this offseason.

Grade: C-




Oakland Raiders

Key additions: S Tyvon Branch (franchised), CB Ron Bartell, CB Shawntae Spencer, G Mike Brisiel, G Cooper Carlisle (re-signed), T Khalif Barnes (re-signed)
Key losses: LB Kamerion Wimbley, CB Stanford Routt, RB Michael Bush, DT John Henderson, QB Jason Campbell, TE Kevin Boss, C Samson Satele, DE Trevor Scott

Analysis: The Raiders' new regime of decision makers were really put in a bind in terms of their salary cap and were forced to watch quite a few good players walk away for nothing. That will be difficult to overcome, especially with a serious lack of draft picks at their disposal. Few teams are hurting for depth like Oakland is right now over its entire roster. The Raiders did keep a big-time playmaker in Branch and were at least able to find some able bodies at cornerback and for their offensive line. There just wasn't much that Oakland could do in free agency this year.

Grade: D





Cleveland Browns

Key additions: LB D'Qwell Jackson (re-signed), DE Frostee Rucker, LB DE Juqua Parker, K Phil Dawson (franchised)
Key losses: RB Peyton Hills, T Tony Pashos, G Eric Steinbach, G Artis Hicks, S Mike Adams

Analysis: Jackson, despite durability concerns, is an extremely productive football player and a very good fit in Cleveland's defense behind the Browns' massive protecting defensive tackles. While the Browns did improve at defensive end opposite Jabaal Sheard, they again didn't pursue dynamic options. The biggest crime of the offseason was Cleveland allowing the Redskins to outbid them for the second overall pick in the upcoming draft, but even after losing out on the right to draft Robert Griffin III, the Browns didn't add nearly enough to consider them as anything but a bottom feeder for yet another year. Though they aren't great players, the Browns did lose three offensive linemen and reinforcements are now needed in a big way.

Grade: D




Miami Dolphins

Key additions: DT Paul Soliai (re-signed), QB David Garrard, G Artis Hicks, CB Richard Marshall
Key losses: WR Brandon Marshall, DE Kendall Langford, S Yeremiah Bell, QB Chad Henne

Analysis: This was a brutal offseason for the Dolphins. It's apparent that Miami isn't an attractive landing spot for players or coaches that have other options. Now, we have to look at the Dolphins as in full-blown rebuilding mode. Trading away Marshall leaves the Dolphins without a single frightening receiving threat. It's tough to win in this league now-a-days with such a roster deficiency. And scanning over this roster, where is Miami better now than they were when the season ended? Miami did retain Soliai, one of the league's top defensive cloggers. At least that is something positive.

Grade: D-

 

[tallglassofwater007]

Not trying to beat a dead horse, just curious.... Why is everyone thinking CK will be behind center before long?? Is this more that there is a confidence that Harbaugh is grooming him nicely and he is ready, or is it more the thinking that Alex Smith is just isn't that great and would be easily replaced?? Or is it that he was drafted (traded up for) so he will start because that's why we got him??

 

[Flyingiguana]

Not trying to beat a dead horse, just curious.... Why is everyone thinking CK will be behind center before long?? Is this more that there is a confidence that Harbaugh is grooming him nicely and he is ready, or is it more the thinking that Alex Smith is just isn't that great and would be easily replaced?? Or is it that he was drafted (traded up for) so he will start because that's why we got him??

well he has a big arm, so people think the grass is greener.

 

[clyde_carbon]

well he has a big arm, so people think the grass is greener.

When will the grass be greener? When there's a Drew Brees or Peyton Manning in FA? Or is it when we're picking 1st overall again and an Andrew Luck is staring us in the face?

What if neither of these things happen? Is the grass never going to be greener than the one Alex is standing on?

 

[clyde_carbon]

Actually, don't answer that. Getting into a debate about Alex with is like throwing the poop back at the monkeys in the zoo.

 

[Bemular]

Not trying to beat a dead horse, just curious.... Why is everyone thinking CK will be behind center before long?? Is this more that there is a confidence that Harbaugh is grooming him nicely and he is ready, or is it more the thinking that Alex Smith is just isn't that great and would be easily replaced?? Or is it that he was drafted (traded up for) so he will start because that's why we got him??

From my perspective, I see Harbaugh wanting much more out of the passing game this season and I expect he & Roman will install an offense that will be outside to far outside of Smith's comfort zone.

As long as Smith can run this new offense and produce wins he remains the starter - if he falters then it is next man up, which is Colin at the moment but even that could change after August.

 

[Flyingiguana]

When will the grass be greener? When there's a Drew Brees or Peyton Manning in FA? Or is it when we're picking 1st overall again and an Andrew Luck is staring us in the face?

What if neither of these things happen? Is the grass never going to be greener than the one Alex is standing on?

our franchise qb might not even be on our roster...

i've said this before, unless smith improves, he's a placeholder until we get that franchise qb. if it's kap, great but i wouldn't count on it.

 

[MHSL82]

From my perspective, I see Harbaugh wanting much more out of the passing game this season and I expect he & Roman will install an offense that will be outside to far outside of Smith's comfort zone.

As long as Smith can run this new offense and produce wins he remains the starter - if he falters then it is next man up, which is Colin at the moment but even that could change after August.

+ 1 Billion. And this is how it should be. Last year was understandable because of the lockout and it being Kaepernick's first year. However, to do it again this year would be a mistake. It would not be fair to Smith and it would not be fair to Kaep. Why play Smith the way that you know you don't want the future to be and then say he couldn't do it? Wouldn't that just be a waste? Why keep Kaep on the bench if you're going to go out and play an offense that isn't like what you want? If you aren't going to least explore if Alex could do it? (I don't buy anyone's arguments that he can't, just that he hasn't. But I also can't say that he can do it, either.) I don't think it is as drastically different that it would be like trying to fit a quare peg in a round hole. (Aside: square pegs can fit through a round hole if the peg is smaller than the hole. (If the distance between opposite corners are the same as the hole's diameter.) But obviously, it wouldn't serve the purpose or achieve its maximum effectiveness. So Smith may be successful in this offense, but Kaep still better. If that makes any sense. Success or failure are not the only choices.)

We need to do a few things, IMO:

1. Install the offense that Harbaugh wants regardless of who is at QB.
2. Open and honest evaluation of who is the better QB at the moment, while still developing the other QB (even if this QB is Smith).
3. Allow the better QB at the moment the opportunity to fit into this offense they've envisioned. No quick judgments on what Alex/Kaep can or cannot do. Developing the other should help if it's clearly sink.
4. Re-evaluation as the season goes on regards to what offense they envisioned and what offense they are getting with who they've chosen.
5. As long as that QB is performing to this standard, stick with him regardless of contract/money due to the other. This includes next year, the following year, etc. There should be no pressure to play Alex or Kaep.

If it's Alex, let him sink or swim. No more hand holding, but still great coaching. I understand that the playcalls were due to the coaches perceptions of what he could or could not do, whether that's physical, mental, or contextual limitations (like the lockout, supporting cast, etc.). However, if the playcalls were more aggressive last year, we'd have more INTs but wouldn't get pestered daily on being 29th in yards. If Harbaugh can find a balance with that without compromising the future that's the key. It isn't important that Smith is our QB (or Kaep for that matter) but rather that we always have the best QB on the roster at the moment on the field and we win.

If Kaep is our starter, bring him in slowly, but ask him to do as much of what we're going to ask him to do as early as we can. Otherwise, we're taking the risks, but not the benefits that he presumably offers. We can't, of course, be stupid and call deep passes all game without some getting used to the NFL speed. But to bring him up Alex style may not tap into the reasons why we got him and it would maybe have been better to play Alex a bit and come out a bit more aggressive than 2012 Kaep, in 2013 with Kaep.

 

[MHSL82]

If Kaep is our starter, bring him in slowly, but ask him to do as much of what we're going to ask him to do as early as we can. Otherwise, we're taking the risks, but not the benefits that he presumably offers. We can't, of course, be stupid and call deep passes all game without some getting used to the NFL speed. But to bring him up Alex style may not tap into the reasons why we got him and it would maybe have been better to play Alex a bit and come out a bit more aggressive than 2012 Kaep, in 2013 with Kaep.

I always run out of time to edit...

Some may say we need to bring him in slowly and this means lower expectations this year and higher expectations next year. But if we can get to the NFCC game with a limited playbook, hand-holding of the QB, we can do it with Kaep if we strike a balance. I don't believe in wasted years, so whatever more we would ask him this year than we would have last year, is where this year becomes valuable. If we are going to play him this year exactly like we would have last year, then it was a waste in my opinion (absent a SB). We reasonably chose to sit Kaep last year, but it does have some consequences of losing a year if we don't use what we've gained. (I think regardless we'd get better production this year than last year with Kaep hypothetically but I also want to see a benefit in comfort and trust in the QB for the system.)

 

[RedneckNiner]

I don't care who is under center. Having seen Kaep a lot in college yeah I am highly skeptical. But if he comes out and beats Alex out of a job then Hot damn I'm Happy, If Josh lights it up and wins the job, Hot damn I'm happy, If Alex does it then hot damn I'm happy. I want whoever gives the Niners the best chance to win under center. Just tired of the we want carr, we want Just Turn it Over, We want Hill, We want Kaep. Props to Alex for last year an hopefully whoever wins the job in preseason gets us the next step to a super bowl.

 

[deep9er]

From my perspective, I see Harbaugh wanting much more out of the passing game this season and I expect he & Roman will install an offense that will be outside to far outside of Smith's comfort zone.

As long as Smith can run this new offense and produce wins he remains the starter - if he falters then it is next man up, which is Colin at the moment but even that could change after August.

no doubt they'll want to increase the passing game this season, the offensive unit is intact so everyone is already with the scheme. its logical they'll do more in the passing game, especially after adding FA receivers.

but don't see us come out and become a passing team, my guess is we'll start off throwing a little bit more, then build game over game.

 

[Bemular]

no doubt they'll want to increase the passing game this season, the offensive unit is intact so everyone is already with the scheme. its logical they'll do more in the passing game, especially after adding FA receivers.

but don't see us come out and become a passing team, my guess is we'll start off throwing a little bit more, then build game over game.

I agree. I don't see us abandoning the run, nor do I see our play ratio changing much from the ~50/50 it was last year, but I do see Harbaugh wanting (demanding) more than 3200 yards and 17 TD's from the same ~50%, if that makes sense.

 

[Crimsoncrew]

Me neither.

The addition of downfield threats certainly plays to Kaepernick's strengths more than Alex's. We'll see what happens. Should be an interesting camp/season.

 

[deep9er]

I agree. I don't see us abandoning the run, nor do I see our play ratio changing much from the ~50/50 it was last year, but I do see Harbaugh wanting (demanding) more than 3200 yards and 17 TD's from the same ~50%, if that makes sense.

i think it does make sense, we'll try to increase these stats by throwing more "medium" passes as opposed to "check downs". also by being more efficient - complete more passes and/or getting more RAC's.

 

[MHSL82]

The addition of downfield threats certainly plays to Kaepernick's strengths more than Alex's. We'll see what happens. Should be an interesting camp/season.

I think this is true but it's been overplayed, a bit. Regardless of who we had at QB, we needed to address the receiving corp. Regardless of who's at QB, with Harbaugh's offense and WCO, I feel we needed to have some more downfield threats. Alex never has had multiple, reliable downfield recievers so his game isn't defined fully. His skill set is a little more defined, but not fully set. Kaep's arm is stronger, but it's not like all our passes are that far. (Kaep's advantage in mobility is not directly reflected in us getting downfield threats besides simple diversion. An effect yes, but not exclusive.) Alex's arm is strong enough for most plays and I feel that if the rest of his play is to a certain level, we could make it without any of the few distance passes he doesn't regularly make.

Having said that, I believe people are also saying he can't do things that he hasn't been asked to do or hasn't had the personel. That doesn't excuse the passes he has screwed up, but as far as what his game is, I feel it's been exaggerated. There, of course, are touch passes, tight windows etc. that Alex has not been consistent in producing, but we don't know Kaep's abilities in the NFL there, so these additions don't speak more to him than to Alex per se.

Kaep could very well be better than Smith and it appears that the FO wants him as QB. But these moves I think were made for football reasons of this season as well as if not more than the future. (Moss for one year, Manningham only two years. It's conceivable that Alex buys another year for himself.)

 

[threelittleturds]

I just hope people don't think last year was the very best Alex Smith can do...

I guess it is easy to forget that they only had about 8 weeks to install the offense before the season started because they won 13 games. That short time frame seems to have led to an incredibly conservative approach, although I do keep hearing people say that it was actually "Smith's limitations".

Not to say he doesn't have limitations, but c'mon... 8 weeks tends to put a larger constraint on the offense than whatever Smith can't do. That was Vernon saying that he didn't know the full playbook until almost the end of the season. Maybe I'm crazy... but Smith's limitations can't possibly have something to do with players not knowing the full playbook until the end of the season.

As to CK, hey... the grass is always greener. Smith is pretty much a known commodity. For the most part, we know he lacks confidence and can stink up the joint pretty bad when he won't pull the trigger and take a chance. While there is hope a better WR corps will make Smith better, there is no guarantee. So why not shift that same hope towards CK?

All of us want the same thing though, for the QB to succeed. I'm pretty sure we don't care if it is Smith, CK, Tolzien or Johnson... just want one of them to have a legitimate statistical argument for the Pro Bowl. Since in the NFC, going up against Rodgers, Manning, Cutler, Stafford, Newton, etc... means that they had a pretty awesome year.