- Thread starter
- #1
Cobiemonster
Well-Known Member
Depth move
Last edited by a moderator:
Shultz is a terrible signing. He even looked bad compared to the other Oilers d-men. WTF? Paul, are you still calling the shots behind the scenes?
Having ranted about that, someone is on the move and soon. Probably tomorrow. Wait. Today.
Terrible signing? Someone who at best will be a 6th d-man? He's a guy that they'll be able to scratch and if he has to play in a game he'll be able to handle it well - that's what you want from a 6-7 d-man
That's what was said about Gervais, too.
I see Schultz as an improvement over Hal Gill in the 7 spot. Gill played approximately 98 minutes of hockey last season.
If they use this signing to justify moving Grossmann for picks, then I'll have issue with it.
Gill was actually an 8, correct? Gus was the 7.
We'll revisit this if and when Schultz is forced into the line-up for any length of time.
Band aids to much bigger problems.
My argument is that adding Schultz is like rubbing dirt in the wound.
Band aids to much bigger problems.
that's exactly what it is. the solution to the bigger problems lies with morin, hagg, ghost, sanheim, and company, NOT free agency or trades. signings like Schultz are 1 year band-aids until the youngsters are ready.
key to the deal IMO is that it's 1 year.
It's like a worn bandaid from someone with HIV IMO.