- Thread starter
- #21,061
They're in a prime spot to land Nabors..I'm not sure that's who I'd pick for them, surely they could use some help on either side of the line or the defensive LB/DB's, but entirely possible.London, Bijan, Pitts. Add in another rookie. Cousins has a lot to work with in ATL just like MIN
Finally, one that makes sense. Little lighter in the wallet than I was hoping for, but still nice!
Probably edge bc the WR class is so deep but definitely tempting to take anotger WRThey're in a prime spot to land Nabors..I'm not sure that's who I'd pick for them, surely they could use some help on either side of the line or the defensive LB/DB's, but entirely possible.
And Nabors would surely bump London to #2 status
jsut checked all my typical mock sites..every damned one of them..Nabors, Nabors, Nabors..lolProbably edge bc the WR class is so deep but definitely tempting to take anotger WR
Sam Darnold is suddenly the hot name...Vikes, Broncos, Vegas. Lot of people assuming a year in SF learning from Shanny Jr. will make him respectable, I dunno. Stranger things have happens, but I have my doubts.Meanwhile, Minnesota has Nick Mullens and Ty Chandler.
Super Bowl, here we come!
Id have Nabers going #5-#9. Bears trading up to grab Nabers seems like a likely trade, too.jsut checked all my typical mock sites..every damned one of them..Nabors, Nabors, Nabors..lol
well the mock drafts rarely are right, so there's that, but dang, that's where most of the places that I respect enough to check on have him going.
I think this kinda cements Stevenson as the lead guy with Gibson being more of the receiving guy.Antonio Gibson moves from Washington to NE. hmm..not the worst thing that could've happened to my guy Rhomandre..but could be better
For a one or two year loaner, I'd rather have Flacco.Sam Darnold is suddenly the hot name...Vikes, Broncos, Vegas. Lot of people assuming a year in SF learning from Shanny Jr. will make him respectable, I dunno. Stranger things have happens, but I have my doubts.
wow, I was expecting 35-40..but 45..damn. Good for him. Contract years for Pitts, London, and maybe B. Robinson will be interesting$45M/year
This deal's gotta give London a bump.$45M/year
I think it is essentially a 2 year deal, if I had to guess100 mil guaranteed.
Now my head just exploded.
Like I said, gotta give the guy credit.
I am curious too. No updates yetAnyone got info on what Jacobs is signing for?
Curious after the Barkley deal.