Series Thread: ECF: Boston Celtics vs Cleveland Cavs

[DorianRo]

Enjoy the greatness, stop pouting pussy

Oh I will. We'll revisit this thread and you when LeBron FALLS in the finals once again against a QUALITY team

 

[Black Adam]

LOL at Love would be the best player on Boston.

Boston Celtics 2018 Statistics - Team and Player Stats - ESPN

4 guys on the team that are playing better than Love. 2, possibly 3 I would take over Love, depending on what my team needed.

funny you brought it up because bspn was just saying how much of a near NON factor he was in the Indy series...

guess it's a good thing they got the Raps in the 2nd round...

 

[MikeMed]

I also think this goes 7......I think Boston takes game 1...........I think Boston will contain James to being mostly a jump shooter limiting his dunks and layups.........I made a small wager taking Boston +2............Cant wait for tip off

 

[Mecca]

You are saying they can get all 3 or just 1 of the 3?

They can add one of the 3 and still keep Redick.

@WiggyRuss didn't think that was possible unless JJ took a huge pay cut.

 

[DJ]

Why are you always posting about Lebron's hairline? We know his hair is going the way of the Dodo bird. But why do you have to post about it everyday?

Asking for a friend.

Wamu is just jealous, wish he had his hairline?

 

[DJ]

funny you brought it up because bspn was just saying how much of a near NON factor he was in the Indy series...

guess it's a good thing they got the Raps in the 2nd round...

Oh, missed that. Just got back Taco Bell.

 

[DJ]

They can add one of the 3 and still keep Redick.

@WiggyRuss didn't think that was possible unless JJ took a huge pay cut.

They have a lot of cap space.

 

[DJ]

Love this announcing crew, ready for this to start.

 

[TurnUpTheHeat]

Oh I will. We'll revisit this thread and you when LeBron FALLS in the finals once again against a QUALITY team

He prob will lose.
He'll also prob cause the same discussion about if the MVP can be on the losing team.

@Wamu
I'll start tagging you on pro James posts.

 

[TurnUpTheHeat]

Hoping the Celts can steal game 1, but it's prob just hope.

 

[Montalban]

Cavs in 6

Agreed, unfortunately. Might even be 5.

 

[DJ]

Oh I will. We'll revisit this thread and you when LeBron FALLS in the finals once again against a QUALITY team

They are about to lose this series to a quality team with a great head coach.

 

[Wamu]

He prob will lose.
He'll also prob cause the same discussion about if the MVP can be on the losing team.

@Wamu
I'll start tagging you on pro James posts.

You're an okay fella. Thank you.

 

[Montalban]

He prob will lose.
He'll also prob cause the same discussion about if the MVP can be on the losing team.

@Wamu
I'll start tagging you on pro James posts.

Not possible. He can be the best player in the finals, or player with the best performance in he finals but he cannot be MVP if the team loses. MVP means most "valuable" The team could have lost the series without him so having him on the team provided no value....assuming the team values winning.

 

[Inimical]

I have no idea who will win this series. So much can happen. But Definitely Lebron has to dominate every game.

 

[DJ]

That was pretty easy.

 

[TurnUpTheHeat]

Agreed, unfortunately. Might even be 5.

If Cavs win this, 5.
If not, 6.

 

[Montalban]

They are about to lose this series to a quality team with a great head coach.

Unfortunately that won't happen. It won't even be particularly close. The scores of the games might be close but the maximum this series goes in 6 games. Cavs will take it.

 

[TurnUpTheHeat]

@WiggyRuss

Less than a minute for foul 1 on Love.

Now he has to defend even less.

 

[TurnUpTheHeat]

Not possible. He can be the best player in the finals, or player with the best performance in he finals but he cannot be MVP if the team loses. MVP means most "valuable" The team could have lost the series without him so having him on the team provided no value....assuming the team values winning.

I agree.
That doesn't mean the talking heads won't be discussing it like in the past.