NEPatsfan
Well-Known Member
Every year this dumbass argument comes up and EVERY YEAR... the people using it lose one simple statistic.
During the Patriots reign. They have nearly an identical win percentage in the AFC East (.788) as they do vs the rest of the NFL (.788). They beat everybody. They were 8-5 vs Peyton and the Colts. They've dominated Ben and the Steelers. New England averages 12.6 wins per 16 games against AFC East teams, they average 12.1 wins per 16 games outside of the division. Both are a league best.
Furthermore, the AFC East has not been terrible during the Patriots reign. It's been middling. League average. The fact that the Patriots PLAY in that division has everything to do with the fact that no one else can make headway (DUH).
The AFC East has been just mediocre — not terrible — during the Patriots’ reign - The Boston Globe
The AFC East, outside of the Patriots, is more accurately described as mediocre as opposed to terrible over the past 17 years. Though the division hasn’t had a sustained, worthy rival to New England since 2002, it also hasn’t had the sort of chum (the Browns come to mind) that has been tossed in the water of the other divisions.
That’s evident in looking at the performance of AFC East teams as a whole outside the division. Thanks to the Patriots, the AFC East has the best out-of-division winning percentage (.540) of any NFL division in the last 17 seasons. But removing the Patriots — as well as the top out-of-division team in each division — over the same span, the AFC East looks like a middle-of-the-pack grouping.
The Bills, Jets, and Dolphins have a combined .465 winning percentage when playing teams outside the AFC East. Which is better than the non-Colts teams in the AFC South (.446), and largely in line with the bottom three teams in the AFC North (.468 in out-of-division games) and AFC West (.476, not including Denver).
In other words, most years, the competition in the AFC East looks a lot like that in the other AFC divisions.