Robotech
Well-Known Member
The Spurs did have championships in 2003, 2005 and 2007 so thats as close of a comparison as I can come to. Both teams had a top coach. One of the years the Spurs didnt win a championship, the Spurs lost in the 2nd round which would be kinda like a MLB team losing in the NLDS. One of the years the Spurs were a play away from the Finals.
The Spurs are/were widely respected and certainly feared. What they did was impressive and they were the favorites at least half of the time even if people thought they were 'boring'.
What the Giants have done is impressive. I won't haggle over terms because its blatantly obvious they aren't a dynasty. They are simply the best and the class of MLB in terms of playoff success and finding ways to win when it matters.
I'm okay with that. These Giants are still a historically great team. Let's just reserve dynasties for teams that win three championships in a row.