Dynasty League Roster

[Trudem]

Yeah I wish we had a few more roster spots.

 

[Chef99]

Hey I went to bat hardcover for Ball last year. ..I don't let my Donkey hated cloud my judgement in fantasy football I have no issues drafting or trading for Broncos who produce, or who at least, i think will produce.

As for CJ..I've explained and given rational reasons as to why CJ isn't the back many think he'll be. But by all means, make that mistake if you can't see it.

Yeah, you guys can't deny this. Treff stuck by Montee until the bitter end. Funny thing is, maybe this is the year...

 

[SteelersPride]

Treff convinced me to draft ball in my big money league. I had the second pick. Needless to say I finished second to last

 

[Trudem]

I just hear everything flowing in the right direction for CJ. I have both Anderson and Ball on my team in a dynasty league so ime good even if there is an injury.

 

[leftypower]

Yeah, you guys can't deny this. Treff stuck by Montee until the bitter end. Funny thing is, maybe this is the year...

Yep - gotta admire a guy who sticks to his beliefs - even when they don't pan out. .....

 

[SteelersPride]

Boom Texans got frenchy

 

[TREFF]

Treff convinced me to draft ball in my big money league. I had the second pick. Needless to say I finished second to last

Yeah sorry about that SP..if it helps I went right along with you. Only league I didn't draft him in was my big money league where the chick drafting 4th took him in front of me!

 

[TKOSpikes]

Boom Texans got frenchy

Psyche!

 

[SteelersPride]

Yeah sorry about that SP..if it helps I went right along with you. Only league I didn't draft him in was my big money league where the chick drafting 4th took him in front of me!

Hey u were right, he just had some tough matchups up front, and some lackluster play..... Can't predict injury

 

[SteelersPride]

Psyche!

I see that hmm

 

[Barilko]

At least you made a smart move and grabbed Grimes.

Tks Chef could be Polk though

 

[SteelersPride]

i got polk

 

[Chef99]

Whatta ya gonna do? Could be all Blue, Grimes or Polk, and it could be RBBC, which is what they are saying.

I find it hard to believe they are thinking about The Law Firm.

 

[TKOSpikes]

I can see myself quietly going insane as to our roster size. What were we thinking?

 

[HaroldSeattle]

I can see myself quietly going insane as to our roster size. What were we thinking?

Agree, all these waiver players you would like to add to the roster. We'll fix it next year.

 

[Yellow Fuzzies]

Roster size does seem a little short. Difficult to speculate on players as you need all your roster spots to adequately fill this year's roster.

 

[TREFF]

I think that was the point when we decided on the roster size. .make it a little difficult so you couldn't just stash guys on top of guys. As nice as more spots would be, I'll be voting against any expansion

 

[TKOSpikes]

I think that was the point when we decided on the roster size. .make it a little difficult so you couldn't just stash guys on top of guys. As nice as more spots would be, I'll be voting against any expansion

I just find it sad to see what will be a dozen or so 100 point WR on waivers, not to mention a few handcuffs that might be stolen if injury were to occur at RB. And there are a few, what some would call high end/high potential TE leftover.

Just doesn't seem "dynasty" worthy, IMO. Maybe I shouldn't get too hung up on titles.

 

[TREFF]

I just find it sad to see what will be a dozen or so 100 point WR on waivers, not to mention a few handcuffs that might be stolen if injury were to occur at RB. And there are a few, what some would call high end/high potential TE leftover.

Just doesn't seem "dynasty" worthy, IMO. Maybe I shouldn't get too hung up on titles.

Those guys are only there because jag offs like me have guys like Cord Patterson, Thomas Rawles, Ray Rice and Terrell Pryor on a roster. .everyone has at least one guy who probably doesn't belong in a normal fantasy roster, but we're choosing to chance that potential over the safe play...the choices we make.

And I like that we have to make them.

 

[leftypower]

Roster size does seem a little short. Difficult to speculate on players as you need all your roster spots to adequately fill this year's roster.

I think that was the point when we decided on the roster size. .make it a little difficult so you couldn't just stash guys on top of guys. As nice as more spots would be, I'll be voting against any expansion

I just find it sad to see what will be a dozen or so 100 point WR on waivers, not to mention a few handcuffs that might be stolen if injury were to occur at RB. And there are a few, what some would call high end/high potential TE leftover.
Just doesn't seem "dynasty" worthy, IMO. Maybe I shouldn't get too hung up on titles.

I have to admit that I voted for the 18 roster size - but am feeling a little remorse at this time. Seems we could add two more bench spot in a supplemental draft if that's what everyone wants (why wait til next yr?). The main problem is that some of the guys picked up on waivers probably would have been drafted - so whomever had them in their cross-hairs missed out - which is probably not fair to them. As much as I'd like another two spot to 'stash' I think in all fairness it's too late to address an type expansion this yr.