dash
Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy bacon
Higgy with a Dan Quayle moment
and here i thought Higgy was mocking young dirty ***** poor spelling (ie "champian")
obviously gave her too much credit
that's what i was thinking too.. clearly higgy has sterling reputation on here
you and that nasty word... grrrr..
that's what i was thinking too.. clearly higgy has sterling reputation on here
FAIR!!!!!!!!!!
I have a hard time believing that this is just Jacobs. If 29+ (because of ownership teams) other grown ass men who have held power most of their lives cowtow to ONE owner, than they are pussies and we deserve a lockout. This smells to me like there are other owners with a lot of power out there that are just fine letting Jacobs play the villain, all the while enjoying being a faceless, nameless bad guy.
I still find it suspicious how when the public opinion of Snider went south, suddenly there were all these stories about how he's old school and fighting hard to get a deal done and wants hockey back as bad as we all do and how he loves kittens and cotton candy and everything.
When we've reached the PR battle, shit is beyond repair.
I would guess much like everything else, it's a 10-80-10 split.
10% on one extreme
10% on the other
Everyone else somewhere in the middle.
And like in politics, only the extremes seem to get heard.
And only one has been solidly in one camp the whole time. Another was, but has a PR machine going 24/7 convincing us all he's an angel.
100% agreed. There's no way, in my mind, that one owner out of 30 is creating a lockout. I'm sure that one owner has a lot of pull, but there's just no way it's only Jacobs.
If a bad owner makes you question your team allegiance than I am not sure how good of a fan you are to begin with. I understand if he is shopping the team to other cities or something but if he is just an ass or inept, well lots of teams have owners like that. Like the team, not the owner.
I was about to post something similar. I don't think a douchebag owner should make you switch teams. Especially since most teams are likely being represented these days by some form of douchebagery either at the owner level or the player level or both.
I have a hard time believing that this is just Jacobs. If 29+ (because of ownership teams) other grown ass men who have held power most of their lives cowtow to ONE owner, than they are pussies and we deserve a lockout. This smells to me like there are other owners with a lot of power out there that are just fine letting Jacobs play the villain, all the while enjoying being a faceless, nameless bad guy.
As for BTM, I'd recommend still rooting for the Bruins, but not supporting them. Don't go to any games, don't buy any merchandise and if you can go watch the game at a bar (so as to limit the amount of TV ratings they get). Root for the laundry, not the sometimes douchebags who own the team or play on the team. Just my suggestion, obviously, you can do whatever the hell you want.
Okay so lets just take the small handful, Let them stay locked out and let the other teams start a season.
When that cocksucker Jacobs either sells the team (which will never happen) or his dead ass is rotting in hell, I'll cheer for my beloved Bruins again. What's the sense of rooting for them if I don't go to games out of protest? That in itself ruins it for me.
This!!!!! Or better yet, tell the NHL to fuck off and start a new league with their 24 teams or so. Jacobs may not be the ONLY owner playing hardball but he's definitely the leader of the pack and always tries to bully the other owners. From what I understand, the owner of the Flyers despises Jacobs.