Manster7588
I Support Law Enforcement.
I fully agree a 3 year high $$$$ deal screws over the team, and the reason I once suggested a 3 year 35M per year deal.I think this 3 year contract is media based and not real. The club would not only lose on the term but also the signing bonus and average per year. That would be just rubbing the organizations nose in shit all the way around. A negotiation is win and concede on certain aspects of a contract for BOTH sides.
NOW...I don't know a bigger Dak homer than me from day one but I will tell you if Dak continues to leave this up to his agent, who clearly seems to have his own best interest in mind and determined to get Dak on the open market. Dallas has to draft QB at 10 and plan life after Dak. If it were me, I'd put the transition tag on our QB, let other teams negotiate with France and if they don't want to match an offer, then they get compensation for the lose in next years draft.
This gives Dak a chance at a new deal after the new TV contract hits, and secures Dak in Dallas until then.
3 years 100 or 105M fully guaranteed might get Dak coming off injury, under contract.
They could do 3 years 115M ( 35 + 35 + 45 = 115) guaranteeing years 1 and 2 then resign him before year 3.
Regardless of public words I have to believe Dak's injury is in both sides minds.