• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

D. Ware

randymon

Well-Known Member
4,441
555
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
Redding,CA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I would agree in part with this. I agree I would not pay him more than what the Jets paid ED. We can't have that much money tied up in the WR position especially like you said we are working to become a more balanced team with a great run offense. I still think Sanders though is a better player than Decker. He does a much better job of beating press coverage and winning the one on one battles. He is not the red zone threat that ED was for sure but in every other part of his game he is better in my opinion. He is clutch especially on 3rd down and he has been the guy that both Osweiler and Manning looks to in those crucial moments. I'm willing to try and see what we get him signed for where with ED I thought it was a good idea we didn't even offer him a contract. Now if Latimer develops though then I do think you have to let Sanders walk. We drafted him for a reason and I hope he does show to be a great receiver for us.

Don`t think there`s enough time to see if Lat develops before Sanders decision. I hope he doesn't ask for too much because that guy has saved Denver's butt on 3rd down with tough catches more than any other wr on this team not to mention his toughness and willingness to block downfield,etc. Anyone, imo, who doesn't see what a huge part he is to this teams success, is blind. Guys like Sanders don`t just fall off trees. Denver is very fortunate to have him and I hope they realize that come negotiation time. At this point right now.... There isn`t another wr on team besides DT ( and I think Sanders has played bigger role in wins anyway) that has or looks to have the skill set he has. Very valuable to me anyway. We will see who makes the most critical plays for Denver in these next 4 games and beyond. My money is on Sanders.
 

cdumler7

Well-Known Member
27,142
5,065
533
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 9,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Don`t think there`s enough time to see if Lat develops before Sanders decision. I hope he doesn't ask for too much because that guy has saved Denver's butt on 3rd down with tough catches more than any other wr on this team not to mention his toughness and willingness to block downfield,etc. Anyone, imo, who doesn't see what a huge part he is to this teams success, is blind. Guys like Sanders don`t just fall off trees. Denver is very fortunate to have him and I hope they realize that come negotiation time. At this point right now.... There isn`t another wr on team besides DT ( and I think Sanders has played bigger role in wins anyway) that has or looks to have the skill set he has. Very valuable to me anyway. We will see who makes the most critical plays for Denver in these next 4 games and beyond. My money is on Sanders.

Why wouldn't we have the time? Sanders is under contract for one more year while Latimer is under contract for 2 more beyond this year. So we can keep Sanders for cheap and see another off season of Latimer and if he can be that replacement. I agree though that Sanders has been the better more consistent receiver for us. I hope we can find a way to keep him but not many teams have put over $20 million just towards the receiver position and done well. Throw in DT's contract is the first one that I feel like Elway really took a huge chance on DT rising up to be an even bigger star. Really we cannot cut him if he falls off until the final year of the contract and even then it would still be a pretty big dead money hit. So whether we like it or not I think we are stuck with DT and then whoever we draft unless we can sign another player to a similar contract like what Sanders got with that $5 million a year type deal.
 

randymon

Well-Known Member
4,441
555
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
Redding,CA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Why wouldn't we have the time? Sanders is under contract for one more year while Latimer is under contract for 2 more beyond this year. So we can keep Sanders for cheap and see another off season of Latimer and if he can be that replacement. I agree though that Sanders has been the better more consistent receiver for us. I hope we can find a way to keep him but not many teams have put over $20 million just towards the receiver position and done well. Throw in DT's contract is the first one that I feel like Elway really took a huge chance on DT rising up to be an even bigger star. Really we cannot cut him if he falls off until the final year of the contract and even then it would still be a pretty big dead money hit. So whether we like it or not I think we are stuck with DT and then whoever we draft unless we can sign another player to a similar contract like what Sanders got with that $5 million a year type deal.
Oh,I was under impression some were saying we need to cut Sanders THIS year. Or before next season
 

cdumler7

Well-Known Member
27,142
5,065
533
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 9,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Oh,I was under impression some were saying we need to cut Sanders THIS year. Or before next season

I think Duffman had said something about how we need to keep Sanders at all cost this next year. Well at this point since he is under contract I don't think the team needs to do anything. He thought we should just go ahead and sign him long-term. To me with all the other guys we have to resign we might as well push that can down the road another year unless Sanders wants to sign long-term on the cheap. I doubt he does as this next contract could be huge for him if he keeps playing at a high level.
 

Duffman

Well-Known Member
13,655
4,123
293
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Location
Denver, Colorado
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,535.51
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think Duffman had said something about how we need to keep Sanders at all cost this next year. Well at this point since he is under contract I don't think the team needs to do anything. He thought we should just go ahead and sign him long-term. To me with all the other guys we have to resign we might as well push that can down the road another year unless Sanders wants to sign long-term on the cheap. I doubt he does as this next contract could be huge for him if he keeps playing at a high level.

I'm just worried that if he gets to free agency after next year someone desperate is gonna offer him a huge deal that we can't match. He's worth a lot(not as much as a true #1 but still up there) but if we can't extend him during the season next year I think he's gone.
 

cdumler7

Well-Known Member
27,142
5,065
533
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 9,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I'm just worried that if he gets to free agency after next year someone desperate is gonna offer him a huge deal that we can't match. He's worth a lot(not as much as a true #1 but still up there) but if we can't extend him during the season next year I think he's gone.

While I agree I would love to see the team extend him to me the bigger issue is just how much money we have to go around. While we will have plenty of Cap Space with cutting a few players this off season we also have to spend quite a bit just on the players that are for sure up this year. If we have the money then yeah go ahead and extend him. The way I have it figured up though with players with similar production and what they got contract wise to the players we have I don't see it happening. A lot though will depend on what we do with Osweiler and say we do keep him how much is he going to cost? I've seen analyst say expect something like what Matt Flynn got with 3-years/$20 million (if this happens oh my goodness I will jump for joy) to that of Nick Foles type contract at 2-year/$24 million. So anywhere from $6-12 million. Now if we win the Super Bowl all bets are off on contracts for many of these players. If we get Osweiler for closer to $6 million then yeah I think we stand a very good chance of getting Sanders locked down for a couple of extra years. If he is closer to $12 million though money will get tight in a hurry.
 
Top