Sure semantics , Pats violated the 2007 memo about filming from sidelines. They broke the rules but didnt cheat, right?
Some will say that any unfair advantage is cheating. PED's , salary cap violatins, filming, bounty, stickem, under and over inflated balls, piped in noise etc etc.
Was that him in that movie? I always wondered but wasn't really sure.
I'm sure there are many other teams that break the rules just like the Patriots do. Cheating has been a part of sports forever and will always be if someone sees a competitive advantage.
I saw it first hand when my son was playing Pop warner. another coach gave my son's coach film on a team they were playing for the title. Then in HS they pay for HUDL. Every game is filmed and also has film on the upcoming team, to watch and break down patterns
Bounty programs are no "cheating." That's like saying AJ Green "cheated" by selling one of his jerseys in college. That was against the rules, but it wasn't "cheating."
If he did something like bring a hammer onto the field and hit someone with it, that'd be cheating. Bounties don't injure people; you still have to hit the guy. It's still wrong, but it's completely different from cheating.
Wrong. Videotaping a defense is like stealing playbook. And they didn't just violate a 2007 memo; that rule was around during all of the Pats' SB wins.
All of those except the bounty is cheating. If a coach bets an opposing coach $1000 on a game that isn't cheating; it's a serious violation, but it doesn't give any one team an unfair advantage. Neither does paying a guy for a brutal hit.
If the bounty is carried out, it IS cheating. I don't see why that is so difficult to comprehend for some of you.
Paying a teammate $500 for a brutal hit doesn't give the team an unfair advantage. That's what people mean by "cheating" when they're talking about the Patriots.
Josh Gordon didn't "cheat" when he violated the terms of his probation with the NFL.
Guess we can agree to disagree , because imo breaking the rules is cheating. Why were rules put into play in the first place?. If Pats are found guilty and broke the rules ( cheating) by deflating the balls even though it showed to be counter-productive, they should pay the price and you can label it anyway you want, semantics or not
The definition of semantics is what something means.
Why were rules made in the first place? Depends on the rule. There's a rule saying what colour socks they can wear. That doesn't have anything to do with maintaining level competition.
To try and hurt somebody for $$$ on purpose is the worst thing you can do in sports.
And using help to catch a ball is cool, no biggie, so spray or stickem away.
Paying a teammate $500 for a brutal hit doesn't give the team an unfair advantage. That's what people mean by "cheating" when they're talking about the Patriots.
Josh Gordon didn't "cheat" when he violated the terms of his probation with the NFL.
You're going to have to be a little more articulate than this.