- Thread starter
- #21
Rock Strongo
My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
And neither is the "point" portion of the argument...
a lot of people seem to think it may be.
And neither is the "point" portion of the argument...
a lot of people seem to think it may be.
yyyyyup
"a rogue writer"
lol
enough people for this?You and?
your posted tweet said "not a rogue writer"Huh?
Rogue writer? Pretty impressive credentials in terms of knowing the law and the league.
Andrew Brandt: Executive Profile & Biography - Businessweek
your posted tweet said "not a rogue writer"
i then said "rouge writer"
and here we are, panties bunched.
just go commando, much easier.Wtf?! Misunderstanding your post = panties bunched. Lmfao. Gotcha.
just go commando, much easier.
enough people for this?
these things dont come out...you know, denails...explanations... out unless its more than just "me" seeing it.
Andrew Brandt ✔ @adbrandt
Follow
Cowboys web site discussing Peterson addition is not tampering, but hard to believe it's a writer "going rogue." Sign-off from above.
9:32 AM - 17 Apr 2015
noSo you and the guy that first and foremost says it is "not tampering"???
no
you read at a 2nd grade level.
try it again.
yup, you read at a 2nd grade level.Y.O.U
A.N.D
T.H.E
G.U.Y
T.H.A.T
S.A.Y.S
I.T.'s
N.O.T
T.A.M.P.E.R.I.N.G.?.?.?
yup, you read at a 2nd grade level.
read what i wrote again, like an adult, and see the error you made.
i gave up crayons after my masters.What you said leaves me at You and??? Not sure how to make it clearer at this point without crayons and a white board...
Disagree completely, it's just you STILL
Sincerely,
person without an agenda...