puckhead
Custom User Title
Appreciate it.Lol I think the shop next to my office is listed there. I’ll stop in on my way to work; I go early so if they have it I’ll grab it.
Red over white if there is an option.
Kids, man....
Appreciate it.Lol I think the shop next to my office is listed there. I’ll stop in on my way to work; I go early so if they have it I’ll grab it.
I tried one in Etobicoke yesterday on the list, likewise were clueless.Jebus, it took trips to six different Timmy's to find one of the disposable cups out here.
The first 5 had no idea what we were talking about.
This is actually embarrassing.
I think it's safe to say the following:Any guess what the team has offered?
I do not see any team out there with cap space to give him $11M, so the Leafs would be fools to give it to him. And I dont think they will.
At this point, Dubas might say 3 x $9M, take it or enjoy the raclette.
I think it's safe to say the following:
-The team is offering $9M x 3, but Marner wants at least $10.5M and going by Dreger's comments there maybe even $11M at that term
-The team is offering $10M x 5 but Marner wants the full Matthews value at that term.
And because there is literally no reason for Dubas to sign Marner at anything even close to what he's apparently demanding, Dubas is fine just sitting on the sidelines and waiting for the comparables to sign.
Marner doesn't have the luxury of dragging this to Dec. 1 because of the Leafs' cap situation so he's pretty much got just over a month to either come down, hope for a trade that Dubas doesn't laugh at or enjoy spending the year in Switzerland for $1 mil because he couldn't close a $1 mil gap in order to get paid $10 mil. Sounds smart to me.
/Maybe he's still negotiating an offer sheet
It's definitely an overpay but 1) Dubas overpaid both Nylander and Matthews by the contemporary market standards so why anybody thinks he won't this time is beyond me, and 2) If we can't lock him up long-term by that time then they're going to have to make a decision with regards to his UFA status anyway.Even that would be such an overpay, especially since I'm sure that the last year of the deal would be big to set up a big qualifying offer that could arbitrate him right into free agency. As I see it any bridge deal could basically end up being a 4 year deal that walks him right into free agency unless it's appropriately cheap (like a bridge deal is fucking supposed to be! ) and he's got some incentive to re-up long term at the end of it.
It's definitely an overpay but 1) Dubas overpaid both Nylander and Matthews by the contemporary market standards so why anybody thinks he won't this time is beyond me, and 2) If we can't lock him up long-term by that time then they're going to have to make a decision with regards to his UFA status anyway.
And as they say with GMs, who really cares about 3 years from now? Odds are you won't be the guy dealing with it anyway.
Ideally, yes but if that's not going to be possible in this negotiation without handing Mitch that $11 mil that Paul Dreger's crying about then I think they bite it and get it done at that high bridge.I'm just saying that if I'm a player who gets a 3 year deal where the final year is $10.5-11 mil or so (which is what we're probably talking about) you can all but guarantee that I'm going to be a UFA in 4 years, even if I want to and do end up staying. I can't help but think the Leafs would want to avoid this situation.
Ideally, yes but if that's not going to be possible in this negotiation without handing Mitch that $11 mil that Paul Dreger's crying about then I think they bite it and get it done at that high bridge.
"Sorry, I hitted your roof. I have no money."Um, how?