Shit.
Good question. I honestly don't know how to answer that. I guess the only guy I'd consider hands-off is Rielly but if it had to be some kind of combination of Nylander, Marner and/or this year's first I'd pass. At least until we know how it ends with Sign Stamkos.
You?
Yeah, that would seem perfect too.Nashville just makes way too much sense for this not to happen, IMO. Jones or Josi pretty much straight up, Weber if C-Bus decides it wants more in the order of name recognition.
Basically re-package what the Leafs got for Kessel for RyJo. Maybe toss in an NHL defenceman instead of Kapanen, like Gardiner and a protected first (despite the fact I think Gardiner has been really, really good this season).I probably wouldn't include any of Rielly, Nylander or Marner. I'd deal this year's first but there'd have to be some protection on it.
I'm not paying anyone full value for a guy they can't wait to get rid of, you know what I'm saying?
Nashville just makes way too much sense for this not to happen, IMO. Jones or Josi pretty much straight up, Weber if C-Bus decides it wants more in the order of name recognition.
Jones or Josi straight up? That is way too fair a deal for a situation like this.
Another good point - if this is a trade that has to happen, I'm not letting the Finnish scout make it if I'm John Davidson.Then again, these people did give John Tortarella the reigns of their own free will, so.....
Pretty much straight up. CBJ likely adds a decent sized plus to a Josi (good prospect and/or 2nd) deal and slightly smaller one for Jones (Option to swap 1sts in 2017 or a 2nd)?
If Johansen is on the market there will be at least 10 teams that see a Torts benching for what it is. They'll look back on the ~135 points he's scored in the last two seasons. I don't anybody will be able to get him THAT cheap.
Then again, these people did give John Tortarella the reigns of their own free will, so.....
Another good point - if this is a trade that has to happen, I'm not letting the Finnish scout make it if I'm John Davidson.
You don't know how bad I want Johansen to come out and say "I will only play in _______ (probably Vancouver). If they trade me anywhere else, I am sitting out."
Pretty much straight up. CBJ likely adds a decent sized plus to a Josi (good prospect and/or 2nd) deal and slightly smaller one for Jones (Option to swap 1sts in 2017 or a 2nd)?
If Johansen is on the market there will be at least 10 teams that see a Torts benching for what it is. They'll look back on the ~135 points he's scored in the last two seasons. I don't anybody will be able to get him THAT cheap.
Then again, these people did give John Tortarella the reigns of their own free will, so.....
I think that every team that gets involved will basically be thinking like I said ("if you don't want him, why would I give you full value for him?") That's just good negotiating.
I mean, if Columbus could still be expected to get full value for him after all of this shit why would forty_three be so upset that it's happening?
Well, then they're truly fucked lolisnt JD the guy who wanted Torts though ? ... whos truly pulling the strings here ?
I think that every team that gets involved will basically be thinking like I said ("if you don't want him, why would I give you full value for him?") That's just good negotiating.
I mean, if Columbus could still be expected to get full value for him after all of this shit why would forty_three be so upset that it's happening?
Figures. David Savard and Jack Johnson miss the game and suddenly the team has flow and put 6 on the board (so far).
But it was all because no Johansen.
It's never about the guys who are in popcorn row, 43. You know that.
It's about a complete team effort. Nobody taking shifts off and committing to supporting your teammates.
That and getting Jared Boll back in the lineup. It's a team effort but really this one was all Boll and his grit and determination. True leadership.