Comedy BRONZE Vancouver - redux

[dash]

Dan Milstein is his agent after all...

 

[esls79]

Klingberg is supposedly in the lineup tonight. Will Boeser get a hat trick or only two goals?

 

[dash]

Klingberg is supposedly in the lineup tonight. Will Boeser get a hat trick or only two goals?

This is a possible Stanley Cup Finals pre...ha ha ha sorry, I couldn't quite finish that sentence.

 

[mattola]

 

[dash]

This sounds like Sergei Fedorov defecting from Russia back in the early 90's

 

[mattola]

Classic Saturday night sports results in BC

 

[Bloody Brian Burke]

Classic Saturday night sports results in BC

Ya but how’s the PDO?

 

[Bloody Brian Burke]

And then what happened?

 

[puckhead]

Ya but how’s the PDO?

regressed based on today's .834 (in my head math, so forgive me if i fuck it up)

 

[dash]

At what point do we call him a ball Walsher?!?

 

[jstewismybastardson]

 

[jstewismybastardson]

 

[puckhead]

 

[puckhead]

Studnicka cleared

 

[dash]

 

[mattola]

What do you think is fair dash?

 

[dash]

What do you think is fair dash?

First off, I don't want any part of Garland + Beauvillier as Dhali mentioned, I'm kinda curious why the Canucks would want to part with Garland as he's looking pretty good of late. Beauvillier strikes me as pretty meh, he's trending towards a guy that will bounce between the NHL and AHL in my opinion.

I don't think Hoglander will interest Conroy all that much either to be honest. I'd rather try to get a 1st round pick from the Canucks in the upcoming draft, but I think the Canucks will balk at that. It will likely require a 3rd team getting involved for Tanev to return to the Canucks.

 

[mattola]

First off, I don't want any part of Garland + Beauvillier as Dhali mentioned, I'm kinda curious why the Canucks would want to part with Garland as he's looking pretty good of late. Beauvillier strikes me as pretty meh, he's trending towards a guy that will bounce between the NHL and AHL in my opinion.

I don't think Hoglander will interest Conroy all that much either to be honest. I'd rather try to get a 1st round pick from the Canucks in the upcoming draft, but I think the Canucks will balk at that. It will likely require a 3rd team getting involved for Tanev to return to the Canucks.

I think we get rid of Garland now as he most likely wont sustain the strong play and for his salary

my question is he that good of a dman that he is worth a first pick?

 

[dash]

I think we get rid of Garland now as he most likely wont sustain the strong play and for his salary

my question is he that good of a dman that he is worth a first pick?

The big concern with Tanev is that his style of play often leads to injury, but he's been pretty good with the Flames (did miss 17 games last season, but played all 56 games and then all 82 games during his first two seasons with Calgary). Is he worth a 1st round pick? He doesn't put up the points that you would say yes, but Tanev and Hughes playing together would look good for 25-30 minutes per night for Vancouver.

 

[dash]

I think of the trade that Calgary made with St, Louis way back in 1988 when they traded Brett Hull to the Blues for Rick Wamsley and Rob Ramage. It sure hurt to lose Brett Hull, but I don't think the Flames win the Stanley Cup in '89 without the contributions of both Ramage and Wamsley.