Browns beat Ravens in OT, Tgann moves to new home again

[cdumler7]

"then everything changes for this team" <big statement which i never said...

I would never say that bc I cant stand when others do...but u said i did so admit i didnt bc u lied.

You said that with the injured players coming back your team stood a good chance for the playoffs. How is that not changing everything for this season? I mean making the playoffs is goal #1 for every team in the league. So if players returning from injury gives you a good chance at making the playoffs then doesn't that change everything for that team?

 

[Broncos6482]

I'll ask you... whats you take on your question?

Yes. Now will you answer?

 

[Cincyfan78]

One win teams that aren't dead yet | Page 2 | SportsHoopla Sports Forums

You did say that the returning targets would be HUGE for Flacco. It's fair to assume you that you are implying that Flacco has struggled because of his lack of WR/TE's to throw to. With that being the case, it's fair to use your own criteria on what people are saying/using as excuses for their losses. If Flacco is playing poorly, and the reason for it is because of injuries to guys like the TE and the WR, then it's fair to surmise that you are using those injuries as an excuse.

It's also a fair statement to say, if you are a Dallas fan, with Dez/Romo, the score may have been closer. However, both cowboy fans on here have readily admitted that a win was unlikely in either scenario.

 

[Broncos6482]

You said that with the injured players coming back your team stood a good chance for the playoffs. How is that not changing everything for this season? I mean making the playoffs is goal #1 for every team in the league. So if players returning from injury gives you a good chance at making the playoffs then doesn't that change everything for that team?

Careful. You're going to make his head explode.

 

[Tgann69]

Yes. Now will you answer?

its pretty obvious that when starters come back the team is better.

however, saying "then everything changes for this team" when the injured players are back is a far cry from saying..."My team is better when its starters are on the field"

agree?

 

[Tgann69]

One win teams that aren't dead yet | Page 2 | SportsHoopla Sports Forums

You did say that the returning targets would be HUGE for Flacco. It's fair to assume you that you are implying that Flacco has struggled because of his lack of WR/TE's to throw to. With that being the case, it's fair to use your own criteria on what people are saying/using as excuses for their losses. If Flacco is playing poorly, and the reason for it is because of injuries to guys like the TE and the WR, then it's fair to surmise that you are using those injuries as an excuse.

It's also a fair statement to say, if you are a Dallas fan, with Dez/Romo, the score may have been closer. However, both cowboy fans on here have readily admitted that a win was unlikely in either scenario.

This i have already said...

but i didnt not say "then everything changes for this team".... never would bc I cant stand when others do...

agree?

 

[Tgann69]

Careful. You're going to make his head explode.

this is ez...ru chitting me?

 

[Delphic1]

I still can't believe the Steelers, EVEN WITH VICK, lost to that shit team.

Fuck you, Josh Scobee.

 

[Broncos6482]

its pretty obvious that when starters come back the team is better.

however, saying "then everything changes for this team" when the injured players are back is a far cry from saying..."My team is better when its starters are on the field"

agree?

No. It's the same thing. Being better is changing everything. The fact of the matter is, although you didn't exactly say, "everything changes for the Ravens," that same thought is there in your posts when you talk about the team improving once injured players are back. So your talking about injuries is no different then Dallas fans talking about injuries to Romo and Bryant, it just makes you a massive hypocrite for criticizing them for it.

 

[Tgann69]

I still can't believe the Steelers, EVEN WITH VICK, lost to that shit team.

Fuck you, Josh Scobee.

and in the playoffs too...that hurt more right?

 

[Tgann69]

No. It's the same thing. Being better is changing everything. The fact of the matter is, although you didn't exactly say, "everything changes for the Ravens," that same thought is there in your posts when you talk about the team improving once injured players are back. So your talking about injuries is no different then Dallas fans talking about injuries to Romo and Bryant, it just makes you a massive hypocrite for criticizing them for it.

wow... lol...

 

[Broncos6482]

This i have already said...

but i didnt not say "then everything changes for this team".... never would bc I cant stand when others do...

agree?

It's there implicitly in your posts.

Now I'll give you some time so you can go look up that word.

 

[Tgann69]

It's there implicitly in your posts.

Now I'll give you some time so you can go look up that word.

weak weak weak. smh

 

[Cincyfan78]

This i have already said...

but i didnt not say "then everything changes for this team".... never would bc I cant stand when others do...

agree?

I'll agree you did not use those exact words, but I will disagree because the meaning is still the same. You are implying, clearly, that with the return of those players things will change for the better. If it is, and I can quote "HUGE FOR FLACCO", then that is a good thing which we can agree would improve his play. If he's missing those pieces now, and you've talked about how having them back would be "HUGE FOR FLACCO", then we can agree that it changes everything.

Thus, even though those are not the words you said, you are still wrong, because you mentioned them (which earlier in this thread you said you never did, proved wrong) and not only did you mention them, we can correlate you mentioning them into how it would change everything simply because it would be "HUGE FOR FLACCO". If it weren't "HUGE FOR FLACCO" then no change would be expected. However, we know, for a fact, this is not the case. You said so yourself.

 

[Tgann69]

I'll agree you did not use those exact words, but I will disagree that the meaning is still the same. You are implying, clearly, that with the return of those players things will change for the better. If it is, and I can quote "HUGE FOR FLACCO", then that is a good thing which we can agree would improve his play. If he's missing those pieces now, and you've talked about how having them back would be "HUGE FOR FLACCO", then we can agree that it changes everything.

Thus, even though those are not the words you said, you are still wrong, because you mentioned them (which earlier in this thread you said you never did, proved wrong) and not only did you mention them, we can correlate you mentioning them into how it would change everything simply because it would be "HUGE FOR FLACCO". If it weren't "HUGE FOR FLACCO" then no change would be expected. However, we know, for a fact, this is not the case. You said so yourself.

You can not parse words "huge for Flacco" to equal "then everything changes for this team"

and not remotely close

can u not tell the glaring difference in these two statements?

 

[cdumler7]

You can not parse words "huge for Flacco" to equal "then everything changes for this team"

and not remotely close

can u not tell the glaring difference in these two statements?

Can you not see the similarities in the statements?

 

[Cincyfan78]

You can not parse words "huge for Flacco" to equal "then everything changes for this team"

and not remotely close

can u not tell the glaring difference in these two statements?

Yes, you can. And I did.

Because if the return of those injured players weren't "HUGE FOR FLACCO" then no one would expect any change. However, because you yourself stated that their returns would be "HUGE FOR FLACC" we can all easily understand that it changes everything. How could it not? You don't return players and say it's "HUGE FOR FLACCO" without expecting change.

Unless you lied, and the returning players will not be "HUGE FOR FLACCO" and will be useless the rest of the season. In this case, no, nothing changes. However, that is not what you said. In your own words.

 

[Cincyfan78]

Can you not see the similarities in the statements?

He does.

He just doesn't want to admit it.

 

[Tgann69]

Can you not see the similarities in the statements?

One statement says " Gilmore is huge for Flacco" meaning flacco has targeted Gilmore and as his #2 receiver its great to have him back esp. for Flacco.

the other statement "then everything changes for this team" means the injured players being back guarantees success moving forward thereby an excuse for recent ineptness on the field.

Which i clearly did not say.

 

[Tgann69]

Yes, you can. And I did.

Because if the return of those injured players weren't "HUGE FOR FLACCO" then no one would expect any change. However, because you yourself stated that their returns would be "HUGE FOR FLACC" we can all easily understand that it changes everything. How could it not? You don't return players and say it's "HUGE FOR FLACCO" without expecting change.

Unless you lied, and the returning players will not be "HUGE FOR FLACCO" and will be useless the rest of the season. In this case, no, nothing changes. However, that is not what you said. In your own words.

Why would I think on a sports forum intelligent life could exist? this I was wrong about.