{+}Mother-Marge{+}
Well-Known Member
^............*gggggggrrrrrrrr*............^
Im not trying to be a dick here,but woody is actually more right than tedy
I dont believe he was suspended for the balls,i think it had more to do with the cooperation part.ped's you can fail twice before you get 4 games (mandatory per CBA)so they gave him 4 & appeal will be 2
I have to ask you this.you dont really think they were trying to set tom up do you?I'm still waiting for someone to show me proof that says Brady told dumb and dumber to fool with the footballs AFTER they were checked by the ref. Maybe I just missed it in all the minutia that has been flying through the stratosphere since the report came out.
I dont believe he was suspended for the balls,i think it had more to do with the cooperation part.ped's you can fail twice before you get 4 games (mandatory per CBA)so they gave him 4 & appeal will be 2
The rule, from the Player Policy Manual, reads:
"The repeat offender policy has been modified for 2014 in terms of what a player must do in order to be removed from the 'repeat offender' category. Specifically, any player who violates a safety-related rule will be considered a potential repeat offender and will be treated as such should he commit a further violation during a subsequent period of 32 consecutive games. After that period, the player will no longer be considered a potential repeat offender and will be subject to discipline as a first-time offender should he commit an additional violation. For the purposes of calculating the 32-game period, preseason, regular season, and post-season games will be counted; however, only two of the 32 games can be preseason games."
This is where i think spygate comes into play,But there's a precedent for lack of cooperation. Favre: $50,000 for failing to turn over his cell phone. Chargers: $25,000 for failing to cooperate with the investigation of their equipment violation.
This is where i think spygate comes into play,
I have to ask you this.you dont really think they were trying to set tom up do you?
OkI think those two ass clowns were just immature and jealous.
Just my opinion,but i think BB has more influence on this than people thinkBrady had nothing to do with that, but regardless, they got whacked for BB doing spygate. Big fines and lost of a first round pick. They have no standing to give out punishment for something they already punished them for.
Just my opinion,but i think BB has more influence on this than people think
The biggest issue I have is with the halftime measurements. Walt Anderson stated that his best recollection was that he used the Wilson air gauge to test the balls before the game. At halftime, two gauges were used. The halftime readings from the Wilson air gauge showed the balls were within the acceptable level of deflation. The Wells report states that it does not think that Anderson's best recollection of having used the Wilson air gauge before the game is correct. Of course, the report offers no basis for this conclusion, so one can only assume that the report's entire basis for said conclusion is that if it didn't operate under the assumption that Anderson's recollection was incorrect, the balls would not have been deflated below the acceptable amount of PSI, and there would be no basis to assume a violation.
yet the report said he had nothing to do with it or any knowledge of it. can't have it both ways.
There is zero consistency with the NFL. BB should have been suspended for a year. Sean Payton got suspended for a year and he knew nothing about Bountygate. How do you suspend one coach and not the other?