- Thread starter
- #1
ArlingtonCowboys100
Goodell is a polesmoker
Brady is slightly better than Eli. Venatari and Butler bailed out Brady in the 4 victories. But we all know that a qb that throws 2 picks is mvp.
The crazy thing is that his legacy changed drastically because his DB made a great play. He's arguably the greatest quarterback ever because Russell Wilson threw an interception.
Brady had two bad picks. Now go read his stats for the 4th quarter. Great QB's do that, others don't.
His stats in the 4th quarter were great because Seattle lost their pass rush after an injury to Cliff Avril.
Brady didn't play that good (not worthy of MVP) and the only 'good' moments came when Seattle got injured.
Let's not take that for meaning "Seattle wins if..." or I don't feel New England should've won. They played great and deserved the SBOWL for some great plays. But there's a reason Brady was able to drive down so easily in the 4th quarter.
The crazy thing is that his legacy changed drastically because his DB made a great play. He's arguably the greatest quarterback ever because Russell Wilson threw an interception.
Brady is one of the best QBs all time, but he was not the MVP in that game. Butler, Edelmen, Carroll/Bevell's IQ, and Cliff Avril going down were the reasons the Pats won and the MVPs of that game for such.
Brady had two bad picks. Now go read his stats for the 4th quarter. Great QB's do that, others don't.
Swell. He had a statistically good fourth QTR.
That doesn't really change the fact he was a pick away from losing the Super Bowl.
Brady basically did absolutely nothing in that game. He completed a whole bunch of dump off passes and threw a pair of picks. It was a pretty great Super Bowl but chalking it up to Tom Brady is just asinine. The MVP should have went to the defense. Wilson had all the time in the world but NE's secondary made it just a waste of time.
Of course the Patriots were down 10 points in the 4th quarter against the best defense in the NFL with no effective running game.
And Tom Brady took control and scored two TD to put the Patriots in the lead.
No team has come back from a 10 point deficit in the Superbowl to win. In fact I think Seattle has not lost a game with a doubt digit lead. Until yesterday.
He clearly sux.
Of course the Patriots were down 10 points in the 4th quarter against the best defense in the NFL with no effective running game.
And Tom Brady took control and scored two TD to put the Patriots in the lead.
No team has come back from a 10 point deficit in the Superbowl to win. In fact I think Seattle has not lost a game with a doubt digit lead. Until yesterday.
He clearly sux.
I never said he sucks. Just pointing out how silly it is that qbs legacies are based on the amount of super bowl wins they have even though it's a team game. Brady was the Qb of the winning team, he did not win it alone. Why is it that had he done all that and lost the game (which was very, very likely) he would be considered a great Qb, not arguably the greatest
I never said he sucks. Just pointing out how silly it is that qbs legacies are based on the amount of super bowl wins they have even though it's a team game. Brady was the Qb of the winning team, he did not win it alone. Why is it that had he done all that and lost the game (which was very, very likely) he would be considered a great Qb, not arguably the greatest