- Thread starter
- #1
ive said this for months and months:
I could see McCrafry and Fournette being busts
mcaffrey has the NFL genes. the kid CAN play. what matters most is where he ends up. a team/system like new england can probably do more with him out of the box than say, cleveland. (and no he isnt ending up in NE, its just an example)I could see McCrafry and Fournette being busts
I agree 101%I could see McCrafry and Fournette being busts
mcaffrey has the NFL genes. the kid CAN play. what matters most is where he ends up. a team/system like new england can probably do more with him out of the box than say, cleveland. (and no he isnt ending up in NE, its just an example)
fournette...i dont trust him either.
I think to be a bust it requires a first round pick and a less than stellar career. So basically as a RB you Peterson type numbers and I don't see either McCafery or Fournette doing that.
To be considered a boom heck yeah I think the expectations are you should be a first round pick with a HOF career. Otherwise you are just another RB so yeah absolutely. Key is it does not make you a bust just a good career.So they have to have a HOF career as a 1st round RB to be considered successful? Seems like some pretty crazy expectations to me. Just looking over the list of RB's taken in the 1st round since 2000 there are some good names that probably won't make the HOF. Jamaal Lewis for the Ravens I'm sure they would say his pick was worth it. Shaun Alexander for the Seahawks had a very productive career. Willis McGahee did some damage. Steven Jackson is another that did very well. I'm not sure if Marshawn Lynch makes it or not. Chris Johnson has even brought his career back last year with a very productive year.
To be considered a boom heck yeah I think the expectations are you should be a first round pick with a HOF career. Otherwise you are just another RB so yeah absolutely.
So are all those guys I listed just another guy? I look at Jamaal Lewis and he was the offense for the Ravens during that 2000 Super Bowl run. Not saying they couldn't have just won it because of the defense but he definitely was a huge help for that team. Same with Lynch for the Seahawks. Both of those guys are most likely on the outside looking in for the HOF as we sit today.
Again we are talking BOOM or BUST that means you were head and shoulders better than any other player at your position during your career, otherwise you are just a really good player, and there is nothing wrong with that. Bust, well, just the opposite. To me we are talking Ryan Leaf and Tom Brady.This is the type of thread that used to get people banned back in the day. Rules must be different under current ownership.
I don't think an RB needs to make it to the HOF to be worthwhile as a 1st round pick. I do think he has to make the pro bowl at least twice, though, and get to his 2nd contract.
Maybe I just have a different definition of BOOM. If you're top 5 at your position for a notable period of time and stay on the team for awhile then you're a successful first round pick even with a low positional value.Again we are talking BOOM or BUST that means you were head and shoulders better than any other player at your position during your career, otherwise you are just a really good player, and there is nothing wrong with that. Bust, well, just the opposite. To me we are talking Ryan Leaf and Tom Brady.
Absolutely they are just another guy with a good career.
So to you positional value is the same as BOOM? I mean by your definition there is nothing stellar about that it's again a good maybe great career, but not HOF worthy. If you are a top 10 pick as these two RBs are expected to be I think a HOF career should be the expectation. Not just " Hey you were really good while you were here, thanks!"Maybe I just have a different definition of BOOM. If you're top 5 at your position for a notable period of time and stay on the team for awhile then you're a successful first round pick even with a low positional value.