- Thread starter
- #101
tnapucco
Fair as fuck
Put them up against the poor performing teams up there in the poll.Who in the fuck is voting aTm. .500 conference team with nothing but talk
Put them up against the poor performing teams up there in the poll.Who in the fuck is voting aTm. .500 conference team with nothing but talk
Put them up against the poor performing teams up there in the poll.
You are sure the SEC will want Oklahoma? Not exactly the biggest media footprint?
Good football, for sure. Decent bb. What else does OU offer?
Personally, I don't see any conferences expanding beyond 14 teams. The Pac doesn't want to expand beyond 12. Most SECers wish they would have stayed at 12. Most B1G fans wish we would have stayed at 12.
Advantage of a 14 team conference? Two 7 team divisions. 9 game Conf schedule allows for playing every Div team, one guaranteed rival from other Div every year, and the other 6 teams rotate, 2 different teams every 3 years, or a home and away vs each once every 6 years. It's just a simple formula.
You expand to 16 teams and you will almost never play the teams from the other division.
And who would the B1G be willing to add? Notre Dame and Texas are the only two worthy, and both are the biggest headaches in the NCAA. The B1G will NOT give either of those schools what they want and will probably demand.
Nebraska bigtime. Losing a blueblood kills
Who in the fuck is voting aTm. .500 conference team with nothing but talk
What fences does A&M need to mend? They got tired of t.u. having Dan Bebee make the Big 12 all about the longhorns and bolted to a stronger, more stable, and better conference. They made a decision based on what was better for A&M.
I'm going to say none of them hurt. Big 12 has had a playoff spot 3 of the 4 years and continues to have a winning record in bowl games.
I never said a word about being in the Big 10 but trust me shit could change and soon if your conference keeps getting left out. The fall from that academic high horse will hurt at some point.
...how did Neb get in then? They loved the fuck out of some partial-qualifiers back in the day...is that what AAU means? To allow real dumb guise to play "college"?
They didn't have much in the way of research monies either...did they?
...and back to the partial-qualifier element. Exactly how unfair is it that all teams play by the same rules when it comes to academic standards? I've heard many bugeaters say this change in league policy was specifically directed at harming Nebraska. My question would be "Why did Nebraska need so many 'partials' anyway"?
Why did every other Big XII team vote to do away with partials? Some put forth that the league wanted to be perceived as more "ivy than mud"...kinda like the B1G.
I miss the rivalries.
OU/Nebraska
Kansas/Missouri
Colorado and ....
Spare me. Aggy voted in favor of unequal revenue sharing every damn time the vote came up. You boys were even crying like babies after the LHN was created, an idea that was first proposed to your AD by Dodds years ago and your AD said no then changed his mind when ESPN approached your big bro about the LHN. Then, to make things better for Aggy, Texas and OU decided to allow Aggy to get paid $20M a year across the board with UT and OU while the other schools were going to get paid around $12M-$15M with the new TV contracts. Aggy had no problem whatsoever shitting on the other schools with that deal, even though Aggy never competed for NC's, played in major BCS bowls, never won conference titles and were rarely on primetime TV. Fact of the matter is, you got tired of being in big bro's shadow and secretly were planning to bolt to the SEC to be a higher paid bitch, nothiing more, nothing less.
And shares revenue equally and is making more money than it ever has. Don't forget that. Meanwhile, the SEC could give zero fucks about MIZZWHO, CU is the Kansas of the PAC, Nebby is now Minnesota 2.0 and will never win another NC or conference title and Aggy is still the same punching bag the way they were in the Big 12 and will never win a conference title or NC. At least they're getting paid tho......
I believe that Nebraska WAS an AAU school at the time they applied and got accepted into the Conference. And the reason they got dropped down and out of the AAU, from what I've read, was kind of a bullsh1t technicality that apparently didn't concern the B1G Conf enough to retract their invitation.
This a we have been over countless times. Texas never did anything for anybody but Texas, so cut the BS about the Texas doing things "out of the goodness of their heart. That's a lie and you know it.
Bebee was your bitch and bent over backwards to give t.u. everything they asked for. Just admit it. Or don't I really don't care. Enjoy your cupcake conference, I'm happy with A&M in the SEC.
OU offers mens and womens gymnastics titles, most dominant team in college softball, and a mens golf title 2 years ago. OU getting it done in a lot more than just football.
Which shows they will do what they want if $ are at stake.
So using this logic, Texas Tech, Cal and Wake Forest can win a NC if they get the right coach?You foolishly believe both Minnesota and Nebraska will never win another NC or even a Conference Title??? Are you mentally retarded? Where do you think Clemson came from?
Of course. Universities are businesses, and money will always be the deciding factor. Might as well accept that and get used to it.