- Thread starter
- #1
steveringo
People's Front of Judea

Is MLB banning the defensive shift really going to make a difference in baseball?
Does baseball really need this?

Are they gonna paint lines on the field so you stay in position??
ill bring the chalkAt this point if that’s what it takes for us to get baseball get those painted lines on the field
Sadly I agree. But with that said banning the shift is silly because maybe a hitter can learn to hit a pitch to the other field to prevent it moving forward.At this point if that’s what it takes for us to get baseball get those painted lines on the field
They've been saying this for as long as the shift has been a thing. It's not happening. They just try to pull it over the fence and all we get are walks, Ks, and HRs. I definitely favor banning the shift.Sadly I agree. But with that said banning the shift is silly because maybe a hitter can learn to hit a pitch to the other field to prevent it moving forward.
Sadly the hitters that get the shift will either walk, strikeout or hit a HR anyway. And more often or not strike out.They've been saying this for as long as the shift has been a thing. It's not happening. They just try to pull it over the fence and all we get are walks, Ks, and HRs. I definitely favor banning the shift.
The metrics say that swinging for the fences results in the most runs scored, regardless. a pull hitter adjusting his swing to go the other way handicaps himself by taking his strength out of the AB. If he goes the other way, he will either strike out or weakly ground out more often than he will get a “solid single”, all while essentially removing his ability to go yard. Dropping the occasional bunt is fun for the fans, but realistically is just the same as working a walk, but without working the pitches out of the pitcher.Sadly the hitters that get the shift will either walk, strikeout or hit a HR anyway. And more often or not strike out.
Trust me I am with you on this. Having 7 guys on the 1st base side of the diamond is just as silly as watching Joey Gallo bunt or try and send a pitch to the opposite field.The metrics say that swinging for the fences results in the most runs scored, regardless. a pull hitter adjusting his swing to go the other way handicaps himself by taking his strength out of the AB. If he goes the other way, he will either strike out or weakly ground out more often than he will get a “solid single”, all while essentially removing his ability to go yard. Dropping the occasional bunt is fun for the fans, but realistically is just the same as working a walk, but without working the pitches out of the pitcher.
I am a hard core purist. But I have come around to accepting that some kind of defensive position rules are mandatory. I just ask that they are kept as simple as possible. I thing requiring that 2 infielders have both feet on each side of the diamond is probably the best way to attack this issue. I am not sure if a depth rule is needed if you require that each side of the diamond is “covered”.
I am not certain that is true. Since the beginning, hitters have tended to be pull hitters. Especially power hitters. Players who could spray the ball tended to be OBP/BA guys with less power (Gwynn, Suzuki, Boggs, etc). Heck, in early baseball/softball, you would always put your nose-picker in RF because no one even could hit it there (OH SHIT, LEFTY!!! SWITCH!!!).Trust me I am with you on this. Having 7 guys on the 1st base side of the diamond is just as silly as watching Joey Gallo bunt or try and send a pitch to the opposite field.
They do need some common sense rules in place, as you mentioned. But if they take it too far I wouldn't be for it at all.
And no matter what if a professional hitter can't put a decent enough hit in the opposite field, it seems some fundamentals are being lost.
Sadly I agree. But with that said banning the shift is silly because maybe a hitter can learn to hit a pitch to the other field to prevent it moving forward.
How is that different than a hard line drive right at a SS playing deep off the grass for a spray hitter?But I would say that a hitter hitting a 110 mph line drive that might have gone i to the gap gets caught by an infielder playing 60 feet in the outfield grass is not right also.
They already fixed that, 3 batter minimumCan someone truly give a reason for banning the shift but still allowing left handed relievers? Nearly identically the same thing but lefty relievers make the game more boring because of how much time is wasted from them coming in for a batter or two and them being replaced.
How is that different than a hard line drive right at a SS playing deep off the grass for a spray hitter?
I think left handed people should be banned from society in generalCan someone truly give a reason for banning the shift but still allowing left handed relievers? Nearly identically the same thing but lefty relievers make the game more boring because of how much time is wasted from them coming in for a batter or two and them being replaced.
I have always argued that all lefties should be shot.I think left handed people should be banned from society in general