Slaton10
Well-Known Member
Well... since you asked...
IMO, we are seeing improved pass defense in the Big 12 this year as more teams are going to press coverage... using a lot of cover 2 zone and cover 2 man.
Casteel's defense relied on cover 3 zone. While this defense was good at protecting the deep ball... it left the defense vulnerable to short passes... think wide open TE's... or in today's Big 12 offenses... inside slot. And, with only 6 men committed to the LOS, it is easier to have success running the ball against it.
Casteel did have success against OU; however, it was a defense that was dominated by upperclassmen.
Communication in any defense is key to its success. Communication within Casteel's defense appears to rely even more on this factor. Last year, WVU had a true freshman playing free safety. We saw him get burned in the passing game more than a few times last year. I do not believe his performance would have been much better under Casteel. The free safety is kind of like the QB of the secondary.
From what I understand, DeForest tried to implement too many intricacies into the defense last year. He made it too difficult for the kids to grasp. That is why we saw such poor play out of them.
Patterson has gone back to the basics with the kids, and I think that is why they're performing better this year.
Actually Deforest tried to do alot of what Casteel's defense called for...the only difference is how the nickel back was used...and in Deforest's version it left too much responsiblity to LB's being able to cover the middle box....